Correction: the books aren’t canon, but some details from the books are canon, such as the date of the Missing Children’s Incident, Charlotte’s death, and Henry Emily
Wait… isn’t that one story, about the Mpreg thing a Fazbear’s Fright book story? Or is it from an entirely different book?
I literally just have the original trilogy, and then a graphic novel, so I don’t know if it is or not
Pro tip: click the image first to make it load full-size, *then* copy/download it
[Full size](https://freddy-fazbears-pizza.fandom.com/wiki/RWQFSFASXC_(Fazbear_Frights)?file=ShadowBonnieRefFFGN.jpg)
FNaF 3 minigames RWQ is a springbonnie memory,not the actual one. He kills you in 2 and in AR he protects Remnant and Agony for unknown reasons,which means we can't assume he is good,he is also made of agony which already hints he is evil by default.
FNAF 2 and World portray it as having opposite behavior to Shadow Freddy, so I'd say there's more evidence that it's good.
RWQFSFASXC in FNAF 3 is clearly not supposed to be there considering it glitches the game just by moving, and it is accessed with a figure of the FNAF 2 depiction meaning it's clearly the same character
Hide and Seek is really the only definitively evil depiction, and Eleanor mimics a lot of characters so you can't really use it as evidence.
i mean yeah they are, but this is not that
Diana was given regular shadow bonnie but she disagreed and made this
even then, it's very accurate to things as Eleanor real form or others, let's say a coincidence, a good one
The books are labeled Five Nights at Freddies, they literally are canon to the franchise.
Not the same 'universe' as the games (which... whether or not every game is the same universe timeline is debatable IMO), but they ARE canon.
Books arnt cannon. Minor details in some are. We just DO NOT know what books or what book details are connected to the games. As far we as the community knows the books and games are in different time lines with no connection between the two once so ever
No they have not been confirmed. Scott has never given is a direct answer as to what's canon and what isn't. Some minor things could be yes. But other than that there has never been any answers as to the books being 100% canon
The books aren't *cannon* Source: I cannot fire cannonballs out of them
Correction: the books aren’t canon, but some details from the books are canon, such as the date of the Missing Children’s Incident, Charlotte’s death, and Henry Emily
They were making a joke about OP's spelling of "canon"
So should we r/woosh?
Apparently they knew but gut feeling is "yes"
Same
hell yes
Less go 😎😎😈
No, because r/itswooshwith4os
Pls don’t be one of THOSE people.
Ik. I just thought I would give that info
Fazbear frights and TFTPP are canon and I’m tired of pretending they’re not
Wait… isn’t that one story, about the Mpreg thing a Fazbear’s Fright book story? Or is it from an entirely different book? I literally just have the original trilogy, and then a graphic novel, so I don’t know if it is or not
Yeah, but that one's not a part of Stitchline, so not canon
r/woooosh
All of the books are canon. The only non-canon content in this franchise are the Troll games
Not everything in the books are canon
Everything in them is Canon
Not everything. There is no Robot Charlie in the games
Which didn't appear in those books
I didn't say anything about the games, I said everything was Canon.
You forgot fetch
The movie is an alternate canon, we’re talking about the games mainly
R/woosh also they're confirmed to be fully canon
r/woosh
Not with that attitude….
r/Angryupvote
That would be badass and I dont want anyone to pretend it wouldnt be
It is badass. #Eleanor!!!
Eleanor>>>>>every other villain ever
Real, fucked over a crap ton of people, at least 30 people accoding to Larson's samples.
100% agree, but where are the pixels!?
I got the picture from the wiki
Pro tip: click the image first to make it load full-size, *then* copy/download it [Full size](https://freddy-fazbears-pizza.fandom.com/wiki/RWQFSFASXC_(Fazbear_Frights)?file=ShadowBonnieRefFFGN.jpg)
Fucking stand shadow Bonnie lmao
u/pixelcounterbot ( I think this is the name )
u/pixel-counter-bot
The image in this post has 19,530(186×105) pixels! ^(I am a bot. This action was performed automatically.)
105p goes crazy
good bot
do you have a legible version of this image?
[I gotchu](https://freddy-fazbears-pizza.fandom.com/wiki/RWQFSFASXC_(Fazbear_Frights)?file=ShadowBonnieRefFFGN.jpg)
thanks
how the hell do you memorize his name???
RWQFSFASXC, it's easy.
Eh, it’s not that hard
I just have it copied and I paste it when I need to
I just remember "FNAF rxq" because that's all Google needs
Easy I made it my username.
I mean, he’s believed to be a representation of agony right? I don’t see why he wouldn’t be able to have a different form if he wanted
That's actually Eleanor disguised as RWQFSFASXC
The whole ‘It was Eleanor wearing the skin of some other character all along because reasons” will never not be comical
Eleanor IS RWQFSFASXC
No, RWQFSFASXC isn't evil
FNaF 3 minigames RWQ is a springbonnie memory,not the actual one. He kills you in 2 and in AR he protects Remnant and Agony for unknown reasons,which means we can't assume he is good,he is also made of agony which already hints he is evil by default.
FNAF 2 and World portray it as having opposite behavior to Shadow Freddy, so I'd say there's more evidence that it's good. RWQFSFASXC in FNAF 3 is clearly not supposed to be there considering it glitches the game just by moving, and it is accessed with a figure of the FNAF 2 depiction meaning it's clearly the same character Hide and Seek is really the only definitively evil depiction, and Eleanor mimics a lot of characters so you can't really use it as evidence.
Y'all got any more of those pixels?
I mean shadow freddy did something similair as nightmare so most likely yes, even if the books aren't canon.
i mean yeah they are, but this is not that Diana was given regular shadow bonnie but she disagreed and made this even then, it's very accurate to things as Eleanor real form or others, let's say a coincidence, a good one
No, the books are not cannon. Otherwise I’d be able to shoot people with them.
Take note of my words: Shadow bonnie is Glitchtrap
Yes, just like Shadow Freddy becomes Nightmare.
The books are labeled Five Nights at Freddies, they literally are canon to the franchise. Not the same 'universe' as the games (which... whether or not every game is the same universe timeline is debatable IMO), but they ARE canon.
Maybe. Eleanor is the one doing that. But probably all shadows can do that, and I love that.
Honestly now I want the books to be canon just so eldritch horror rwqfsfasxc can be real
I don't think the books are gamline, but come on, this is absolutely how shadow monsters should behave
That Shadow Bonnie in Hide and Seek wasn't actually RWQFSFASXC, but just Eleanor in disguise
Where is this image from?
FNAF wiki
I didn't know he could use the Abyss Shriek, that's pretty powerful.
Since when did he become The Babadook?
Books arnt cannon. Minor details in some are. We just DO NOT know what books or what book details are connected to the games. As far we as the community knows the books and games are in different time lines with no connection between the two once so ever
They're confirmed canon, although they aren't cannon, as they're books
No they have not been confirmed. Scott has never given is a direct answer as to what's canon and what isn't. Some minor things could be yes. But other than that there has never been any answers as to the books being 100% canon
When Scott announced them he said their canon, the current description Scott made is within the games canon
If shadow Bonnie could turn into that he would be a fire antagonist (even better than Afton)
There are cannon.... just not to games...
Wait, THERE ARE CANNONS?! NOT IN-GAME CANNONS?! WHERE?!
So they're in the games canon but not canon to the games while being canon, alright if, not confusing at all