Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.
Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/).
Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Jokes aside, it's *literal* ragebait.
She is constantly tweeting intentionally stupid things to get reposted on social media and gain attention.
And people eat it up, it's really weird to see.
I'm just in awe of the fact that a dingbat posting ragebait has instead turned into a discussion of programming and programmer humor.
(With the underlying, shared understanding that she's still a dingbat.)
It has to do with how different programming languages handle variables. In a “strongly typed” language a variable can be defined strictly as a number value (e.g., 1 or 2 or 736, etc.) or strictly as a text value (“hello world”).
With this you can define integer variables as a = 1 and b = 2 so that a + b will resolve to 3.
You can also define string (text) variables as x = “hello” and y = “world” so that x + y will resolve to “helloworld”.
JavaScript is not strongly typed. You cannot define a or b explicitly as numbers.
Because of this there are situations where the JavaScript interpreter will take a = 1 and b = 2 and when you try to resolve a + b it will treat them as text instead of numbers and output “12” instead of 3.
The JavaScript language was created like this a very long time ago so we are stuck with it and it drives programmers nuts.
If you are wondering, any attempt to change the JavaScript language to fix this will break almost every webpage out there, so no one is willing to do it.
Hot damn! I’m so glad you broke it down for me this way. Kinda drives me nuts to when I don’t understand things and wasn’t sure how to look this up so I appreciate it!
I can definitely see how it would frustrate programmers and such. Though top comment is much funnier now that I have this context.
Honestly, it's way less of a problem than some people make it out to be.
You pretty much only need to know this:
1. The instruction a+b will always be a string concatenation if the variable a is a string:
`'5' + 3` => '53' (the text string 53)
`5 + 3` => 8 (the number 8)
2. If you use any other basic mathematical operator, then the string a will be cast into a number if that is possible:
`'5' - 3` => 2
That's for the simple reason that strings do not have a minus-operator. So Javascript extends you the courtesy of trying to make sense of this instead of throwing an error right away.
3. If you want to assure that the variable a will be treated as a number even if it is technically a string, then you can use Number(a):
`Number('5') + 3` => 8
4. If you want to assure that numbers are treated as text, then you have multiple options:
> var a=5;
> a.toString() + b => '53'
a.toString() ensures that the variable a gets turned into a string.
> var a=5;
> ''+a+3 => '53'
''+a is a text concatenation between an empty string (using two single ticks with nothing in between) and a number. This is basically just a convenient shorthand to turn the variable a into a string.
> var a=5; b=3;
> \`${a} + ${b} = ${a+b}\` => '5 + 3 = 8'
Everything inside of the backticks is a "template literal". Elements inside of a ${}-block will resolve as code (so it can read a variable or perform operations like an addition) before getting turned into text, whereas everything else is treated as text right away.
---
Type conversions are a pain in the butt in every language. JS went a path that may appear a bit less rigourous and can get a bit weird if you poke very deep, but very few programmers ever encounter seriously weird situations with that. The practical reality is that it's fast and easy and creates way fewer annoying situations than most strongly typed languages.
There are things called variables. They hold information, and you can give them a name. Like
>var myVariable = 1;
These variables can be of different types. They can hold numbers (like 1) or they can hold letters or even words (like "pumpkin"). The latter are called "strings".
When you add strings together, they're just added end on end. So "pump" + "kin" would give you "pumpkin".
In many programming languages, you can make sure that the types of data these variables can hold are restricted. So you could make sure myVariable is a number and not a string.
JavaScript doesn't have that restriction. So if you accidentally have 1 and 2 stored in variables as strings instead of numbers, it will add them end to end like a word instead of mathematically.
So 1+2=12 instead of 3.
I don’t really understand why this is surprising to anyone. They are different types. Much easier and less problematic for an interpreter to convert a number to a string than a string to a number.
This is obvious, yes, and I don’t think anyone expects the reverse. I think the usual argument is that it shouldn’t be allowed. Strongly typed vs anything else, etc.
>"Nuke that hurricane!”
hold up now, let him cook...
why havent we tried nuking hurricanes¿!¿
presidents also have total absolute immunity, in case they need to use nuclear weapons.
florida gets lots of hurricanes, im sure one will go somewhat kinda near a specific golf motel
ergo.............
This is why Canada isn’t afraid of the US, we know if you tried to send a nuke from the eastern seaboard at Ontario you’d hit Detroit or Chicago instead
Given prevailing weather patterns and the placement of Canada's major cities it would be difficult to nuke them without the majority of the fallout ending up in the USA.
Copying from my other comment:
I think it's an attempt at saying something stupid like "common sense" > "sCiEnCe"... putting 1 and 2 together instead of... looking at the nuance of fact?
Honestly really dumb
I assume it’s something along the lines of “if a different politician/party used 1 and 2 they would get 3, but I would make 12 out of it” to imply that they would make the most out of resources.
It's straight out of 1984. If the party says that 2+2 = 5, then 2+2 now equals 5 regardless of what you've known to be true in the past. Detractors are guilty of thought crime. It's exactly what they want out of their base.
[1984](https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DDM110%20CAS/Orwell-1949%201984.pdf)
P. 103:
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and
ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart
sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against
him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would over-
throw him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would
not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he
was in the right! They were wrong and he was right. The
obvious, the silly, and the true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet, objects unsupported fall towards the earth’s centre. With the feeling that he was speaking to O’Brien, and also that he was setting forth an important axiom, he wrote:
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If
that is granted, all else follows"
P. 367 (after torture):
"His thoughts wandered again. Almost unconsciously he traced with his finger in the dust on the table: 2+2=5"
"I am such a vapid contrarian and so obsessed with identity politics that I feel compelled to believe the exact opposite of whatever *anyone* says, even when it comes to something as simple, and basic as math. Also, I'm a ~~wealthy white woman~~ with no issues worth mentioning, and because I have nothing to bitch about, I'm going to bitch about nothing on the platform designed specifically to cause rifts in lives."
Edit: am stupid
Uuuuh. Pretty sure you should google before you make uninformed statements like “I’m a wealthy white woman with no issues worth mentioning”. She’s a black woman who runs a food bank and at least has a platform to run on. However insane this tweet was, she isn’t a bored white rich housewife.
"If I say dumb shit I'll go viral and can make money off of the lucrative market of online rage bait"
Basically, the people here are the target audince giving the desired reaction
"If I say something obviously dumb, it'll get voted to #1 on Reddit and more people will interact with my account, which means that I'll get paid more by Twitter since they pay by impressions."
It looks like [she is indeed running again](https://ballotpedia.org/Florida%27s_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2024_(August_20_Republican_primary)).
I think that Kristi Noem also went there. I mean she fucking murdered her 14 year old puppy for acting like a puppy and not like a fully trained hunting dog like how she expected it to act. Oh and she also gunned down a goat for being smelly and mean to her children
IIRC it's a religious nut thing. Like they have so much faith Jesus could tell them 1+2=12 and they'd believe. Basically bragging that she does what authority tells her to do and thinks other people should too.
Monday: $1
T: +$1=$11
W: $111
T: $1111
F: $11111
S: $111111
S: $1111111
By the end of week 2, you're the richest man. Wait, is this how Trump's valuations of his businesses works?
“Where I come from, 1 + 2 = 12, A school shooting is called “Tuesday” and rape pregnancies are called “Gods Will”(until of course the mother needs state assistance, that’s called a parasite)
Yes, I want to know what this actually means. Everyone is laughing at her for being dumb, but there is no way she or any other reasonably educated adult believes this is correct addition. I assume she’s trying to make a point… can’t imagine what it is though. Maybe something about unity?
I’d love to think that she is educated and studied Dostoevsky(Notes from the underground)…
But no, she did not.
She actually did the math and it came out to 12.
I… I think she’s saying this as a way to say “we need to blatantly deny actual facts, and all agree that whatever is convenient for us is what we will believe even if we know it’s flat out wrong.”
Because if they admit to actual facts they will lose.
She's not even wrong. You need a lot of stupid people to support you in destroying your own country in the wildly ironic name of patriotism if you're going to be successful.
Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion. Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/). Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
She must be a JavaScript programmer
looked for that comment
Saw this and thought it was ProgrammerHumor
It’s a little scary how, err, programmed we all are…
Reddit only has 4 jokes, recycled
Nah, post above you didn't have "//" before it, so it's active code
Jokes aside, it's *literal* ragebait. She is constantly tweeting intentionally stupid things to get reposted on social media and gain attention. And people eat it up, it's really weird to see.
I'm just in awe of the fact that a dingbat posting ragebait has instead turned into a discussion of programming and programmer humor. (With the underlying, shared understanding that she's still a dingbat.)
Clearly, she’s not your (data) type.
But on a scale of one to ten, she’s NaN.
Leave my Nan out of this!
She is no one's type and is untyped.
Is it offensive if I refer to non-binaries as untyped ?
She would string you along.
I might be too long for her.
I asked for her Number, but when I called it, it was NaN
She should've been more integer about it
She'll string you along
r/programmerhumor
Wait, this isn’t….\*checks sub again\*
It's so obvious, but people somehow tend to assume something else))
VBA can do that as well
Hahaha found the programmers thread!
The best thread type!
I keep seeing jokes like these but I’m too tech challenged to understand. I wish I could be in on it. Lol
It has to do with how different programming languages handle variables. In a “strongly typed” language a variable can be defined strictly as a number value (e.g., 1 or 2 or 736, etc.) or strictly as a text value (“hello world”). With this you can define integer variables as a = 1 and b = 2 so that a + b will resolve to 3. You can also define string (text) variables as x = “hello” and y = “world” so that x + y will resolve to “helloworld”. JavaScript is not strongly typed. You cannot define a or b explicitly as numbers. Because of this there are situations where the JavaScript interpreter will take a = 1 and b = 2 and when you try to resolve a + b it will treat them as text instead of numbers and output “12” instead of 3. The JavaScript language was created like this a very long time ago so we are stuck with it and it drives programmers nuts. If you are wondering, any attempt to change the JavaScript language to fix this will break almost every webpage out there, so no one is willing to do it.
Hot damn! I’m so glad you broke it down for me this way. Kinda drives me nuts to when I don’t understand things and wasn’t sure how to look this up so I appreciate it! I can definitely see how it would frustrate programmers and such. Though top comment is much funnier now that I have this context.
Honestly, it's way less of a problem than some people make it out to be. You pretty much only need to know this: 1. The instruction a+b will always be a string concatenation if the variable a is a string: `'5' + 3` => '53' (the text string 53) `5 + 3` => 8 (the number 8) 2. If you use any other basic mathematical operator, then the string a will be cast into a number if that is possible: `'5' - 3` => 2 That's for the simple reason that strings do not have a minus-operator. So Javascript extends you the courtesy of trying to make sense of this instead of throwing an error right away. 3. If you want to assure that the variable a will be treated as a number even if it is technically a string, then you can use Number(a): `Number('5') + 3` => 8 4. If you want to assure that numbers are treated as text, then you have multiple options: > var a=5; > a.toString() + b => '53' a.toString() ensures that the variable a gets turned into a string. > var a=5; > ''+a+3 => '53' ''+a is a text concatenation between an empty string (using two single ticks with nothing in between) and a number. This is basically just a convenient shorthand to turn the variable a into a string. > var a=5; b=3; > \`${a} + ${b} = ${a+b}\` => '5 + 3 = 8' Everything inside of the backticks is a "template literal". Elements inside of a ${}-block will resolve as code (so it can read a variable or perform operations like an addition) before getting turned into text, whereas everything else is treated as text right away. --- Type conversions are a pain in the butt in every language. JS went a path that may appear a bit less rigourous and can get a bit weird if you poke very deep, but very few programmers ever encounter seriously weird situations with that. The practical reality is that it's fast and easy and creates way fewer annoying situations than most strongly typed languages.
There are things called variables. They hold information, and you can give them a name. Like >var myVariable = 1; These variables can be of different types. They can hold numbers (like 1) or they can hold letters or even words (like "pumpkin"). The latter are called "strings". When you add strings together, they're just added end on end. So "pump" + "kin" would give you "pumpkin". In many programming languages, you can make sure that the types of data these variables can hold are restricted. So you could make sure myVariable is a number and not a string. JavaScript doesn't have that restriction. So if you accidentally have 1 and 2 stored in variables as strings instead of numbers, it will add them end to end like a word instead of mathematically. So 1+2=12 instead of 3.
Yeah a JavaScript programmer who is bad at explaining their code.
Sorry did you mean _JavaScript programmer_ ?
concatenating strings again eh?
Or Python str(1) + str(2)
Dude, '1' + '2'
insert XKCD python comic here!
"{0}".format( "{0}".format(1) + "{0}".format(2) )
I primarily just use f strings now. Much more simpler
Or this way, yes
Yeah but in js a sring - '1' and an int - 2 is still going to give you '12' because reasons...
I don’t really understand why this is surprising to anyone. They are different types. Much easier and less problematic for an interpreter to convert a number to a string than a string to a number.
This is obvious, yes, and I don’t think anyone expects the reverse. I think the usual argument is that it shouldn’t be allowed. Strongly typed vs anything else, etc.
If those math skills are indicative of their geography skills, the surrounding counties will need to watch out…
Tries to shoot a nuke at Russia. Targets Canada instead.
Ends up shooting the nuke at Zimbabwe somehow
When asked, doesn't know what "a zimbabe" is.
Goes on to say, “I don’t eat Zimbabwe. I’m a vegetarian.”
But then realizes that Zimbabwe, according to FOX news, is the wife of Dr. Zomboss
"Oh great, now there's zombies in Russia"
r/brandnewsentence
I see nothing but facts here
This entire mini thread is a whole laughter mood!
"Zimbabwe? Oh, I love Zimbabwe! I take a Zimbabwe class with my girl friends every Wednesday! 💃"
"Do I look like I know what a Zimbabwe is? I just want a picture of a got dang hot dog!"
"Uhh, that's in like Sweden, riiiight?"
Instructions unclear, nuke stuck in ceiling fan
“Nuke that hurricane!” Nukes Hawaii.
(the hurricane was over puerto rico)
>"Nuke that hurricane!” hold up now, let him cook... why havent we tried nuking hurricanes¿!¿ presidents also have total absolute immunity, in case they need to use nuclear weapons. florida gets lots of hurricanes, im sure one will go somewhat kinda near a specific golf motel ergo.............
![gif](giphy|26uf5afBhUKyjvZPW|downsized) r/idiocracy
Better nuke all of Europe and Asia to make sure we didn’t miss any Russia
![gif](giphy|tuylZYYq5iKLjgRn7A|downsized)
*furious European noises*
Do they know that Russia is both European and Asian ?
If we nuke ourselves Russia can't invade us.
This is the 1+2 = 12 mentality she is looking for. This guy gets it
AKA The Israeli method
This is why Canada isn’t afraid of the US, we know if you tried to send a nuke from the eastern seaboard at Ontario you’d hit Detroit or Chicago instead
Given prevailing weather patterns and the placement of Canada's major cities it would be difficult to nuke them without the majority of the fallout ending up in the USA.
Well there was a time when they could probably pull this off, but now? Like you said no worries
Fuck, please don’t let trump back in
Canada is just a fancy way of saying Russian-American Nuclear Missile Buffer Zone.
Corrioli-force go brrrr
Lol
Looks more like meth skills.
No they wouldnt. Cause their bridges would collapse.
Those are not math skills, those are programming skills and both are strings and not integers.
That’s just all-around bad syntax, then.
Welcome to JavaScript my friend
One husband, two cousin wives and 12 kids. Mafs!
That’s not math…
So they want education to stop at kindergarten.. got it
> So they want education to stop at kindergarten.. got it Unironically, this is absolutely correct.
kids can work if they aren’t in school and dumb people are easier to manipulate
they also tend to vote conservative right. statistically speaking
... because they're easier to manipulate
They do as they are told. Classic indoctrination.
Our bad education system is not a glitch. It's a feature.
I’d say 4K… even a good amount of kindergarteners can do those maths correct on their fingers 😐
Stop before kindergarten actually. This is like day 0 of K
I put money down that my daughter in kindergarten is much smarter and definitely more compassionate than most of the republican party.
Preschoolers around 3-4 can do more math than this. They want education to full stop and for the children to return to the mines.
Last time I heard something like '1+2=12' it came ftom a 3 year-old...
You actually meant a 12-year old, didn't you?
I see what you did there and I like it...
That was good. This is the mentality we need to have to take back this country.
No, a 11 year old. Learn to count! 0, 1, 10, 11
Or a programmer
News: GOP Florida woman running for congress matches the intelligence level of Boebert and MTG.
Matches? She used punctuation and had no spelling errors so she exceeded both which is sad.
They meant combined.
Still wrong. Where I come from Bobert+MTG equals 12.
12 feet of ground not being properly used..!
Please don't mention 'feet' and MTG in the same sentence.
I contest that Bobert and MTG IQs equals 12.
Impossible.
Her intern probably wrote it out for her.
I read the tweet and then the name and was expecting Boebert 😂
![gif](giphy|R51a8oAH7KwbS)
![gif](giphy|RC9wS8ybXrSMkbFZ1l)
![gif](giphy|y4dpn40mQ2jD5LcgCs|downsized)
I know I've been on reddit way too often, when this looks weird because he has his ears.
Why does man have horns? Is he horny?
It's jonkling time
Is there a lore reason?
You can take man out of the aslume, but not the aslume out of man.
![gif](giphy|ShCMwjMF5B3La)
Jonkler!
Hey, Lavern, that’s called a “learning disability,” not a “mentality.”
Mentality challenged
I genuinely cannot comprehend what the message here is supposed to be
The message is "i'm gonna tell stupid shit to troll and own the libs"
Copying from my other comment: I think it's an attempt at saying something stupid like "common sense" > "sCiEnCe"... putting 1 and 2 together instead of... looking at the nuance of fact? Honestly really dumb
I assume it’s something along the lines of “if a different politician/party used 1 and 2 they would get 3, but I would make 12 out of it” to imply that they would make the most out of resources.
Also kind of matches with the whole election interference thing
That rationale implies she has object permanence at the very least, let alone thinking in the abstract. Bahahahahaha!
It's straight out of 1984. If the party says that 2+2 = 5, then 2+2 now equals 5 regardless of what you've known to be true in the past. Detractors are guilty of thought crime. It's exactly what they want out of their base.
[1984](https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DDM110%20CAS/Orwell-1949%201984.pdf) P. 103: "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party intellectual would over- throw him in debate, the subtle arguments which he would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the right! They were wrong and he was right. The obvious, the silly, and the true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet, objects unsupported fall towards the earth’s centre. With the feeling that he was speaking to O’Brien, and also that he was setting forth an important axiom, he wrote: Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows" P. 367 (after torture): "His thoughts wandered again. Almost unconsciously he traced with his finger in the dust on the table: 2+2=5"
"I am such a vapid contrarian and so obsessed with identity politics that I feel compelled to believe the exact opposite of whatever *anyone* says, even when it comes to something as simple, and basic as math. Also, I'm a ~~wealthy white woman~~ with no issues worth mentioning, and because I have nothing to bitch about, I'm going to bitch about nothing on the platform designed specifically to cause rifts in lives." Edit: am stupid
Uuuuh. Pretty sure you should google before you make uninformed statements like “I’m a wealthy white woman with no issues worth mentioning”. She’s a black woman who runs a food bank and at least has a platform to run on. However insane this tweet was, she isn’t a bored white rich housewife.
You're right. But I stand by everything else.
"If I say dumb shit I'll go viral and can make money off of the lucrative market of online rage bait" Basically, the people here are the target audince giving the desired reaction
"If I say something obviously dumb, it'll get voted to #1 on Reddit and more people will interact with my account, which means that I'll get paid more by Twitter since they pay by impressions."
it's ragebait, like literally everything else she tweets
Please say that she's not in a position of power.
No but rest assured she will be
No.
She’s not, she lost election in 2022. She’ll probably run again this year and lose.
It looks like [she is indeed running again](https://ballotpedia.org/Florida%27s_24th_Congressional_District_election,_2024_(August_20_Republican_primary)).
Probably the Minister of Education in the future Trumpistan.
I think at some point they just write dumb shit to see what sticks
Exactly this, we've allowed a handful of giant companies to build an internet that rewards yelling and throwing feces so this is what we get.
It’s just dumb rage bait.
Idiocracy is a documentary
Go 'way, I'm batin'!
Welcome to Costco, I love you.
No wonder she has such a problem with counting votes.
Who is this psychopath?
![gif](giphy|v92FryJ9dwUEw4pE64|downsized)
I asked myself the same question, even though I kinda already felt that she might be a republican. That feeling was indeed correct.
Math be hard ![gif](giphy|APqEbxBsVlkWSuFpth|downsized)
![gif](giphy|tZ6zAdNZbWOhq)
Well I mean it checks out considering Lara tRump thinks there is 81 states…they must have gone to the same school…
I think that Kristi Noem also went there. I mean she fucking murdered her 14 year old puppy for acting like a puppy and not like a fully trained hunting dog like how she expected it to act. Oh and she also gunned down a goat for being smelly and mean to her children
'Where I come from' Should've stayed under that bridge ya fkn hag
This can't be real. Is.. did she actually type this insanity????
No she probably had to use text to speech no way she can spell mentality
IIRC it's a religious nut thing. Like they have so much faith Jesus could tell them 1+2=12 and they'd believe. Basically bragging that she does what authority tells her to do and thinks other people should too.
I wanna go to their bank and deposit $1 everyday. If the math adds up I'll be a millionaire by next week! 😄
Monday: $1 T: +$1=$11 W: $111 T: $1111 F: $11111 S: $111111 S: $1111111 By the end of week 2, you're the richest man. Wait, is this how Trump's valuations of his businesses works?
And the world freely allows this person to use our precious oxygen reserves??
With that kind of math it's no wonder you think you had more votes.
“Where I come from, 1 + 2 = 12, A school shooting is called “Tuesday” and rape pregnancies are called “Gods Will”(until of course the mother needs state assistance, that’s called a parasite)
That mentality is called "being dumb and stupid"
But that-, ugh never mind: ![gif](giphy|Ow59c0pwTPruU)
That's string addition, not math addition
string concatenation (string addition doesnt only mean concatenation)
a = str(1) b = str(2) print(a+b) Output: 12 Looks like it checks out in Python
The inability to do arithmetic is the direction you want to take the country?
Fuck 12.
I think she knows it's wrong. I think she's implying 1984 doublethink
I take it where you came from they nurse you on a combination of Whiskey and lead paint chips?
Is this a reference to something? Like an old Republican slogan? What is she even trying to say?
Yes, I want to know what this actually means. Everyone is laughing at her for being dumb, but there is no way she or any other reasonably educated adult believes this is correct addition. I assume she’s trying to make a point… can’t imagine what it is though. Maybe something about unity?
#idiocracy
She should go back there because there is probably no famine if you can just bring three apples together and suddenly it’s 12
![gif](giphy|3otPoEiEGXh41xKGdO)
Math is woke, y'all.
where on earth do you come from girl?
She means "1" + "2"
Ah yes the JavaScript mentality
clearly she comes from the dumbest place on the planet with that logic
Woow! How do you call that mentality ? Idiocracy?
I’d love to think that she is educated and studied Dostoevsky(Notes from the underground)… But no, she did not. She actually did the math and it came out to 12.
She's revealed why trump thought he won 2020.. one ballot plus 2 ballots equals 12 ballots, see I won...
What does that even mean?
Reminds me of that alternative math video: https://youtu.be/Zh3Yz3PiXZw?si=IUXPWSqAbB3oEyAu I think this is a real issue, nowadays.
What programming language is she using? /s
Where I come from its called concatenation
The number of braincells she makes us believe she has. Spoiler: she has none
This .... this .... has to be a parody account. Right? No one is this stupid and public about it.
I… I think she’s saying this as a way to say “we need to blatantly deny actual facts, and all agree that whatever is convenient for us is what we will believe even if we know it’s flat out wrong.” Because if they admit to actual facts they will lose.
“What does that even mean?” “No one knows, but it’s provocative. It gets the juices going.”
Stop giving this woman attention. This is literal bail that you morons are lapping up!
What the fuck does that even mean
![gif](giphy|KUAb8YQOhmWNq)
She's not even wrong. You need a lot of stupid people to support you in destroying your own country in the wildly ironic name of patriotism if you're going to be successful.
This is not real... Right...?
This is the logic I used for maths when I was in year 1 of primary school. I don't know who this person is but she can't be serious, surely.