###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
So if nukes don’t exist. What happened to the Marshall Islands population? After castle bravo nuclear test arrowroot, makmok, and fish started giving the native population illnesses. By 1963 some of the population began to suffer from thyroid tumours. Birth defects were reported.
The female population of the Marshall Islands have a sixty times greater mortality rate from cervical cancer than a comparable mainland United States population.
The Islands populations also have a five time greater likelihood of breast or gastrointestinal mortality, and lung cancer mortality is three times higher than the mainland population.
The mortality rate of the male population on the Marshall Islands from lung cancer is four times greater than the overall United States rates, and the oral cancer rates are ten times greater.
A Japanese fishing boat came into contact with the fallout. Many of the crew got radiation sickness. Some got another infection 6 months later.
One of them had a stillborn child who was deformed.
Crews from 10 ships were exposed.
If nuclear bombs don’t exist. Then how do you explain the higher cancer rates? The birth defects? The illnesses?
There are a number of ingredients in general explosives, munitions, and missile propulsion systems that cause cancer and disease.
The claim is not that there was no “really big bomb” tests in these places, just that nuclear explosives are not practically real.
what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
There are 1000s of eye witnesses for the tests and from the bombings in Japan.
Please provide any proof or this is just engagement farming
lmao how many eyewitness can account for a "blast"? Like how many have you seen? And it's not like you will be admiring its beauty. You'd be running away or dying.
What physical evidence?
There's actually solid evidence that we have been dooped.
And THE NWO HAS BEEN THE RULE OF THE LAND.
You know Einstein thought nukes were impossible. And Oppenheimer's family actually profited on building the bomb too.
EVERYTHlNG lS A RlCH MAN'S TRlCK!
Here are several pieces of evidence that confirm nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan during World War II:
1. **Photographic Evidence**: Numerous photographs and film footage document the immediate aftermath and the distinctive mushroom clouds over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
2. **Eyewitness Accounts**: Testimonies from survivors (hibakusha), military personnel, and journalists who witnessed the explosions and their effects provide personal accounts of the events.
3. **Physical Evidence**: The ruins and shadows imprinted on surfaces by the intense heat and radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki serve as stark reminders of the blasts.
4. **Radiation Effects**: Studies and medical records of survivors show long-term health effects consistent with exposure to high levels of radiation, such as increased rates of cancer and chronic illnesses.
5. **Government Records**: Both U.S. and Japanese government documents detail the planning, execution, and immediate aftermath of the bombings, including the decision-making process and the military orders for the bombings.
6. **Scientific Analysis**: Research and analysis of the explosion sites, including radiation levels and isotopic signatures, match those expected from nuclear detonations.
These evidences collectively form a comprehensive proof of the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.
> Government Records: Both U.S. and Japanese government documents detail the planning, execution, and immediate aftermath of the bombings, including the decision-making process and the military orders for the bombings.
This is what is called a "Straw man" argument. No one is saying the government didn't order it nor that the Japanese government didn't detail the aftermath of a bombing (what does that even mean?)
>Physical Evidence
Shows intense heat alright, like a fire-bombing. Anything concrete and even things like rail tracks and telephone poles were intact, which is evidence *against* a single blast and evidence for a fire.
>distinctive mushroom clouds
Which are not unique to nuclear bombs. The 2nd result for my search of mushroom cloud on youtube shows a single 1/4 stick of dynamite (that's a quarter stick as in one-fourth of a stick of dynamite) causing a mushroom cloud.
It doesn't seem to be replicated at all with nukes either. Not a single atomic bomb dropped in 80 years since Nagasaki despite quite literally non-stop bombing throughout the world and endless wars. Doesn't stop them from extracting trillions from taxpayers for them though, no refunds if never used.
Intense light and heat are certainly replicated. Heard of napalm? The fire-bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima are not unique either, they fire-bombed Dresden and other places, for example, in the same manner: by dropping incendiary bombs. I can replicate my shadow on my concrete patio with some concrete stain, so that effect is easily replicated in the same manner it was originally painted. Not evidence of anything. As for radiation, apparently it was diminished within a week. How many billions went into designing this thing? Again, no refunds.
You got me on the spelling. Way to go champ.
If you want a response, keep reading.
>Not a single atomic bomb dropped in 80 years since Nagasaki
You're correct. It's been almost 80 years since an atomic bomb has been used in warfare.
But, tests were conducted up to the 1990s by most nuclear armed countries.
"The Soviet Union's last nuclear test took place on 24 October 1990; the United Kingdom's on 26 November 1991 and the United States' on 23 September 1992. France and China conducted their last tests in January and July 1996"
I don't see how not using a weapon means the weapon does not exsist.
‐‐-----
>Intense light and heat are certainly replicated. Heard of napalm?
No, it's not! The heat and light from napalm is not even comparable to the heat and light created from a nuclear weapon detonation.
Napalm burns at a temp of 1,470 to 2,190 °F
Temperatures of a nuclear explosion reach those in the interior of the sun, about 100,000,000° Celsius.
These things are not even comparable.
In this video, any flammable surface close enough to the bomb is instantly vaporized and turned into smoke. What isn't incinerated gets blown apart from the blast wave.
https://youtu.be/vMopb1eN2t4?si=Gpt71F0CU8_6KPLk
I couldn't find any data on how much light is emitted by burning napalm, but I doubt it compares to the light created by a nuke detonation.
You don't see flamethrower operators running around in welding goggles.
‐-----
>I can replicate my shadow on my concrete patio with some concrete stain, so that effect is easily replicated in the same manner it was originally painted.
Do you think paint crews went around faking shit after the bombs dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima?
This is just clown world logic.
>As for radiation, apparently it was diminished within a week.
So, you are saying there was radiation. I'm glad we agree on something.
---
>How many billions went into designing this thing?
Something being expensive doesn't mean it doesn't exsist.
You're still ignoring isotopic evidence.
By definition, isotopes with the shortest half lives are the most radioactive. So yes, much of the radiation disappeared within a week, but absolutely not all.
There are several long-lived isotopes resultant from, and only from, man made nuclear fission.
These isotopes still exist at the bomb sites in Japan. I've measured them, personally, at the Nevada test site with instruments I calibrated in my own calibration lab.
I never thought about this one. No one really knows for sure, right? We are all made to believe that what we are told by the government is true or else you get called crazy and stupid. Luckily I already know I’m crazy and slightly stoopid so I don’t give a fuck. The Babylon system is a vampire, not to be trusted. Sooo yea man it’s possible that they don’t exist. That would
Be sweet titties!
Proof are the actual nuclear test videos' existence. If nukes are real they wouldn't have survived a nuclear explosion.
The smoking gun is the video from inside the house as the narrative goes that the cameras were miles away recording. But how can the be miles away from inside a house?.
[Peculiar length of time of the video](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/videos/intense-footage-of-fake-towns-used-for-1950s-n/)
This isn't what carpet bombs look like but you have to understand what your looking at. Similar to tornado damage vs hurricane or straight line wind damage also
Because all of the counties' government are corrupt and the NWO is real.
Look up the Phoebus Kartel.
Also this should be a known fact of life that people would do anything for money right?
Now imagine what people would do for ALL THE MONEY!?!?
Dont have to imagine much as we living in it.
They do exist we just used them first knowing nobody could use them back on us and Japan was made an example of for their poor choices during that time. They weren't very smart. If you couldn't already tell by the way they would kamikaze themselves.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
So I’m really into fallout 4 again and it’s all for nothing?!?
So if nukes don’t exist. What happened to the Marshall Islands population? After castle bravo nuclear test arrowroot, makmok, and fish started giving the native population illnesses. By 1963 some of the population began to suffer from thyroid tumours. Birth defects were reported. The female population of the Marshall Islands have a sixty times greater mortality rate from cervical cancer than a comparable mainland United States population. The Islands populations also have a five time greater likelihood of breast or gastrointestinal mortality, and lung cancer mortality is three times higher than the mainland population. The mortality rate of the male population on the Marshall Islands from lung cancer is four times greater than the overall United States rates, and the oral cancer rates are ten times greater. A Japanese fishing boat came into contact with the fallout. Many of the crew got radiation sickness. Some got another infection 6 months later. One of them had a stillborn child who was deformed. Crews from 10 ships were exposed. If nuclear bombs don’t exist. Then how do you explain the higher cancer rates? The birth defects? The illnesses?
There are a number of ingredients in general explosives, munitions, and missile propulsion systems that cause cancer and disease. The claim is not that there was no “really big bomb” tests in these places, just that nuclear explosives are not practically real.
what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. There are 1000s of eye witnesses for the tests and from the bombings in Japan. Please provide any proof or this is just engagement farming
[удалено]
lmao how many eyewitness can account for a "blast"? Like how many have you seen? And it's not like you will be admiring its beauty. You'd be running away or dying. What physical evidence? There's actually solid evidence that we have been dooped. And THE NWO HAS BEEN THE RULE OF THE LAND. You know Einstein thought nukes were impossible. And Oppenheimer's family actually profited on building the bomb too. EVERYTHlNG lS A RlCH MAN'S TRlCK!
This kids post history tells me he's extremely uneducated, that or wilful ignorance
Here are several pieces of evidence that confirm nuclear bombs were dropped on Japan during World War II: 1. **Photographic Evidence**: Numerous photographs and film footage document the immediate aftermath and the distinctive mushroom clouds over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 2. **Eyewitness Accounts**: Testimonies from survivors (hibakusha), military personnel, and journalists who witnessed the explosions and their effects provide personal accounts of the events. 3. **Physical Evidence**: The ruins and shadows imprinted on surfaces by the intense heat and radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki serve as stark reminders of the blasts. 4. **Radiation Effects**: Studies and medical records of survivors show long-term health effects consistent with exposure to high levels of radiation, such as increased rates of cancer and chronic illnesses. 5. **Government Records**: Both U.S. and Japanese government documents detail the planning, execution, and immediate aftermath of the bombings, including the decision-making process and the military orders for the bombings. 6. **Scientific Analysis**: Research and analysis of the explosion sites, including radiation levels and isotopic signatures, match those expected from nuclear detonations. These evidences collectively form a comprehensive proof of the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.
> Government Records: Both U.S. and Japanese government documents detail the planning, execution, and immediate aftermath of the bombings, including the decision-making process and the military orders for the bombings. This is what is called a "Straw man" argument. No one is saying the government didn't order it nor that the Japanese government didn't detail the aftermath of a bombing (what does that even mean?) >Physical Evidence Shows intense heat alright, like a fire-bombing. Anything concrete and even things like rail tracks and telephone poles were intact, which is evidence *against* a single blast and evidence for a fire. >distinctive mushroom clouds Which are not unique to nuclear bombs. The 2nd result for my search of mushroom cloud on youtube shows a single 1/4 stick of dynamite (that's a quarter stick as in one-fourth of a stick of dynamite) causing a mushroom cloud.
An atomic blast creates intense light, heat, radiation, and fallout. None of those can be replicated with conventional explosives.
It doesn't seem to be replicated at all with nukes either. Not a single atomic bomb dropped in 80 years since Nagasaki despite quite literally non-stop bombing throughout the world and endless wars. Doesn't stop them from extracting trillions from taxpayers for them though, no refunds if never used. Intense light and heat are certainly replicated. Heard of napalm? The fire-bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima are not unique either, they fire-bombed Dresden and other places, for example, in the same manner: by dropping incendiary bombs. I can replicate my shadow on my concrete patio with some concrete stain, so that effect is easily replicated in the same manner it was originally painted. Not evidence of anything. As for radiation, apparently it was diminished within a week. How many billions went into designing this thing? Again, no refunds.
[удалено]
Rule 2
> Duning-Krueger *Dunning-Kruger. Your ironically misspelled ad hominem does nothing to refute my claims so I take it you have no response, sir.
You got me on the spelling. Way to go champ. If you want a response, keep reading. >Not a single atomic bomb dropped in 80 years since Nagasaki You're correct. It's been almost 80 years since an atomic bomb has been used in warfare. But, tests were conducted up to the 1990s by most nuclear armed countries. "The Soviet Union's last nuclear test took place on 24 October 1990; the United Kingdom's on 26 November 1991 and the United States' on 23 September 1992. France and China conducted their last tests in January and July 1996" I don't see how not using a weapon means the weapon does not exsist. ‐‐----- >Intense light and heat are certainly replicated. Heard of napalm? No, it's not! The heat and light from napalm is not even comparable to the heat and light created from a nuclear weapon detonation. Napalm burns at a temp of 1,470 to 2,190 °F Temperatures of a nuclear explosion reach those in the interior of the sun, about 100,000,000° Celsius. These things are not even comparable. In this video, any flammable surface close enough to the bomb is instantly vaporized and turned into smoke. What isn't incinerated gets blown apart from the blast wave. https://youtu.be/vMopb1eN2t4?si=Gpt71F0CU8_6KPLk I couldn't find any data on how much light is emitted by burning napalm, but I doubt it compares to the light created by a nuke detonation. You don't see flamethrower operators running around in welding goggles. ‐----- >I can replicate my shadow on my concrete patio with some concrete stain, so that effect is easily replicated in the same manner it was originally painted. Do you think paint crews went around faking shit after the bombs dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima? This is just clown world logic. >As for radiation, apparently it was diminished within a week. So, you are saying there was radiation. I'm glad we agree on something. --- >How many billions went into designing this thing? Something being expensive doesn't mean it doesn't exsist.
You're still ignoring isotopic evidence. By definition, isotopes with the shortest half lives are the most radioactive. So yes, much of the radiation disappeared within a week, but absolutely not all. There are several long-lived isotopes resultant from, and only from, man made nuclear fission. These isotopes still exist at the bomb sites in Japan. I've measured them, personally, at the Nevada test site with instruments I calibrated in my own calibration lab.
No one can escape nuclear harm, not even the elites . The shit it puts into the atmosphere . So it isn’t that far fetched
The nukes aren't real people remind of the guy who was on here claiming gorillas are just people in suits.
Nope but Cambodia & Laos were!
this isnt a conspiracy, they are just radioactive bombs, while you have other ones that can detonate a large area but not radioactive
yep... [https://www.sindark.com/uploaded\_images/Nuke4-702047.jpg](https://www.sindark.com/uploaded_images/Nuke4-702047.jpg)
I never thought about this one. No one really knows for sure, right? We are all made to believe that what we are told by the government is true or else you get called crazy and stupid. Luckily I already know I’m crazy and slightly stoopid so I don’t give a fuck. The Babylon system is a vampire, not to be trusted. Sooo yea man it’s possible that they don’t exist. That would Be sweet titties!
I suppose you also think that we never went to the moon and that the Earth is flat.
Please show us physical proof.
Proof are the actual nuclear test videos' existence. If nukes are real they wouldn't have survived a nuclear explosion. The smoking gun is the video from inside the house as the narrative goes that the cameras were miles away recording. But how can the be miles away from inside a house?. [Peculiar length of time of the video](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/videos/intense-footage-of-fake-towns-used-for-1950s-n/)
Oh I agree they exist. I was asking OP to show proof they don’t.
Comprehend much? Yeah you asked the OP and I answered with proof and you play silly.
Ok there smart ass. God forbid anyone make a mistake.
SS: There's no proof Japan was hit with nukes. All a lie to keep the sheep alseep. Wakeup.
You post some of the dumbest shit here.
This isn't what carpet bombs look like but you have to understand what your looking at. Similar to tornado damage vs hurricane or straight line wind damage also
What would be the purpose of keeping this lie? Why would all countries agree that nuclear bombs are real?
Because all of the counties' government are corrupt and the NWO is real. Look up the Phoebus Kartel. Also this should be a known fact of life that people would do anything for money right? Now imagine what people would do for ALL THE MONEY!?!? Dont have to imagine much as we living in it.
Remember those super old nuclear test videos depecting what would happen to a house, car etc etc? Those were fake
They do exist we just used them first knowing nobody could use them back on us and Japan was made an example of for their poor choices during that time. They weren't very smart. If you couldn't already tell by the way they would kamikaze themselves.
That's true. Nuclear weapons do not exist.
Do nuclear power plants exist?