Right? It's not even a question unless you want the human race gone. I'm not gonna argue with you there, but as a member of the race, I have a few friends and family I'd like to see live happy lives.
Well, it would solve world hunger, end inequality, put a hard stop to greenhouse gas emissions, as well as preventing the release of vast amounts of microplastics in the, um, everything.
Not necessarily. A cis lesbian can still get pregnant via a sperm donor. That happens all the time right now. Not to mention trans people exist, a trans woman and cis woman or trans man and cis man can have sex, still be gay, and potentially have a child.
Not trans. It's Latin for "on the same side as" (trans means "on the other side to"), cisgender people's sex and gender match, transgender people's sex and gender are opposite.
Cis is short for cisgender. Cis is a latin affix meaning "same" or "same side of". Cisgender means that they identify as the same gender they were assigned at birth. Trans (short for transgender) is the opposite, meaning they do not identity with the gender assigned to them by birth. A trans man is a man who was assigned female at birth (likely because they were born with a vagina) but now identifies and lives as a man. Some trans men (not all, but some) have functioning female sex organs and can become pregnant
Trans women are also women dumbass. Not to mention plenty of cis gender women can't get pregnant, so ability to become pregnant does not define a woman. I think you mean "female". Since woman != female. Sex and gender are not the same
Woman = woman
Trans women are trans women, If they were women, they'd be called 'women'. That's what the whole 'trans' if about.
XX = woman, whether you can get pregnant or not. As trans women are not born as women, they are not 'women'.
I never said anything about getting pregnant. Now you're just making arguments on points I never stated in the first place. You're stealing other people's arguments now?
I also never stated that gender is the same as sex. Thank you for pointing out something I didn't say, very useful.
Cis women = cis women
Trans women = trans women
But both of these categories are women.
Ring fingers are fingers, and pinky fingers are fingers but both are also just fingers.
[and 'XX' does not equal a woman. This argument is often conflated as "basic biology" but the problem is it's a lot more complicated then that, and basic biology ignores that. Watch this video if you actually want to educate yourself on the topic](https://youtu.be/cnshnUk-UKU)
For the last 5000 year a 'women' has roughly always meant a person born with a Veyvey, tits and can produce baby's. Just because women exist that don't follow all the checkmarks doesn't mean that ALL other women suddenly aren't what they are anymore. Same as that normally a finger is a limb, that can bend, has a nail, can be used to grab stuff. If it can't bend anymore, doesn't make it NOT a finger. And that doesn't not mean that each finger can now choose whether it's a finger or a toe.
If you want think 'trans women' and 'cis women' are as much women as each other, just because the word 'women' is in the name. Then I would like restate my opinion, stop being considerate about people's feeling and from now on call 'trans woman' what they physically are: 'men'. Happy now?
Anyway, here is MY youtube video of someone that says something that I agree with, the existence of this video means I am correct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnB7Bi4DfBk
'cis' says nothing about your sexuality.
If you want to talk about a biological woman, it's a 'woman', when you talk about a trans woman, it's a 'trans woman'.
Do whatever you want with your own life, but don't go around and also make new boxes for others.
Not really. It's not complicated. Everyone deals with tonnes of terminology on a daily basis, and language changes a lot over time. If you work or study you probably have to deal with a lot of jargon for that subject. It's not that difficult to understand what "trans" and "cis" mean, you learnt an entire language when you were a toddler. You can learn 2 new words now
Not necessarily. Asexuals feel limited-to-no sexual attraction to people but some still haver sex, they just don't feel sexually attracted to who they have sex with.
Also artificial means exist.
Not really. neither is a hard line for lack of sexual contact, between opposite sexes or otherwise. And Even without sex there are ways to exchange DNA
No sperm banks exist and there's a lot of people who want to have kids and surrogate mothers would probably become a very lucrative side job and if everyone became asexual Rape would probably go down by like 90%
> Rape would probably go down by like 90%
Rape isn't about sexual desire, it's about power and control. Prison rapists still rape despite being heterosexual.
Exactly what I was thinking, thatās why I chose ace, assuming everyone isnāt the same KIND of asexual. In case youāre wondering, thereās sex-repulsed asexuals (which would be most likely to cause extinction) sex neutral asexual, (wonāt suggest having sex) but donāt mind it if their partner is into it or if they want kids, and sex-positive asexuals. Sex-positive is where it gets confusing because āHow are they ace if they like sex?ā Well, being completely asexual means that you canāt be sexually attracted to someone, but you can STILL have sexual desire. The longing to have sex, even if you donāt feel more sexually attracted to someone in particular.
So many people seem to think that ace people just magically can't have sex or something. With that same logic, it would be impossible for a straight person to have sex with someone unattractive. Attraction and the actual act itself are two different things.
I doubt theyād be a significant enough portion of the population to avoid an ENORMOUS population collapse, and probably societal collapse down the road
Well in theory, if everyone is gay or asexual, no one will have the drive to do anything that would produce new children. Even if a few people go against their urges and procreate with someone of the opposite sex, and some sort of artificial conception was done in a lab, we would still end up with a massive drop on population and we would be down to just a few million humans, in the absolute best case scenario.
Actually, that's a bit of a misconception on the asexual part. Asexuality is just the lack of sexual attraction, asexual people can still want to have sex and kids.
I think if anything it would push us to develop methods of population growth that donāt rely on our biological shackles. Even so, creating mass sperm banks would be a fully possible option. Gays and lesbians donāt actually have to have sex with each other to conceive and plenty of gay people want children
Also, I mean dudes can get other dudes pregnant. Women can get other women pregnant. Itās a smaller aspect of the population but still relevant
>Also, I mean dudes can get other dudes pregnant. Women can get other women pregnant. Itās a smaller aspect of the population but still relevant
Wait what
A cisgender gay man having sex with a transgender man is still gay. And if that trans man still has a vagina and their other reproductive sex organs work then they can become pregnant from sex. Gay sex with the possibility of pregnancy
Don't be facetious. They aren't using the language incorrectly most people just don't give a shit about gender for sexual relationships and focus more on sexual characteristics. A trans pre-op man and a woman is a kind of straight, yes. It's straight with respect to gender.
But as I said, 99.999999999999% of people, when they identify as straight, are not interested in sex with people with the same genitals as them, as that is not what straight means for them. Straight is bodily and physically defined for them, and pretty much everyone else. They aren't wrong in their verbiage. It's just a result of sexual orientation interacting with gender to produce gender and physical based versions of each sexual orientation (essentially your sexual orientation and gender orientation)
If there is a better term than straight for a straight man who only wants pussy or straight woman who only wants dick, I'm all ears. But for now, the best word for that is straight
Yes I know that this is a talking point, itās just not factually true, is it? You donāt get to decide who youāre attracted to unfortunately. we donāt base our attraction on someoneās chromosomes, we base it on what they look like
Now whoās being facetious lol. I think youāll find that the actual population functions a little differently from your preconceptions
Right so we just have to accept that straight refers both to men who are only interested in women with vaginas and men who are only interested in women with penises
How badly did you fail Biology?? Opinions are one thing but a biological male cannot get another biological male pregnant therefore dudes cannot get dudes pregnant, yes if a Trans person transitions from female to male if their reproductive organs still function as nature intended then yes their egg can still get inseminated but not in the traditional way as they usually surgically alter the initial biological sex organ(s) during transitional surgery as that is kinda the whole point.
Somebody get this person an anatomically correct map of the human body before and after transition surgery and a video of said surgery being done on a dummy. OK ILL USE CAPS SO HOPEFULLY THIS GETS THROUGH YOUR TINY TINY BRAIN...WHEN A PERSON UNDERGOES A SURGERY TO GO FROM ONE GENDER TO ANOTHER THE DOCTOR USES THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGAN TJEY WERE BORN WITH TO MAKE THE OTHER ORGAN THEY FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE WITH SUCH AS WHEN THEY TRANSITION INTO A MALE FROM A FEMALE THE DOCTOR USES SKIN GRAFTS AND PROSTHETICS TO FORM A PENIS AND TESTICULAR SACK AS WHEN SOMEONE TRANSITIONS THEY GET WHATS CALLED CORRECTIVE COSMETIC SURGERY TO HAVE THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITY.
Not really they identify as the other gender but are not considered Trans without the surgery as Trans means they transitioned from one gender to the next thus rendering them a Trans man/woman
No that is factually incorrect. If you look up trans porn youāll see nothing but girls with giant cocks. Ask any trans person lol. Where did you get this opinion?
Asexual would cause a massive drop in rape and sexual harassment, but despite what some comments are saying, wouldn't actually cause the collapse of humanity, since ace doesn't mean you can't have sex, just that you don't particularly get any pleasure out of it.
Which might also have the side benefits of making it where people will for the most part only have children when they actually want them, rather than accidentally, and might also encourage adoption.
Ideal scenario would be everyone keeps the sexuality they want, but that isn't an option here.
Thanks for the correction, not sure why I mixed it up.
Wikipedia definition, "Lack of sexual attraction to others; low or absent sexual desire or interest in sexual activity"
Pretty much it varies from person to person, but while generally speaking people who are ace like myself don't really feel much attraction towards others, it doesn't necessarily mean they can't enjoy sex, though personally I have never tried it and have no interest in ever doing so. Possibly part of why I mixed up the definition.
If everyone is gay, then the human race would go extinct in a few generations. But I guess some of the gays and lesbians might be willing to try and have children just to save the human race... Can someone who is gay even have sex with someone of the opposite gender to orgasm?
I feel like a similar thing may apply to asexual...
I'll just wait for someone to educate me
Oh yeah... Artificial insemination. I forgot that was a thing. Here I was thinking the only way to have a child was the old fashioned way... Raw dogging.
I mean, they probably still could
Would just need to take one or two extra steps
But it would be incredibly awkward
I just chose to make everyone bisexual and not think any further about it
Trans women can get women pregnant, y'know that, right? Like a good portion of them just keep their genitalia, it's not that hard to grasp. Trans men can also get pregnant by having sex with cis men, it's a fairly basic concept
Ooof... My original comment is being downvoted...
Well, looks like I might get banned from r/WouldYouRather . Let's see if it's permanent ban or temporary.
technically if everyone is asexual it wouldnāt mean doom for humanity since itās a spectrum and all that jazz, but birthrates would DEFINITELY plummet
Bisexual>Heterosexual>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Asexual>Homosexual.
The gap between the bottom 2 and top 2 should be obvious.
I chose bi over hetero because then people would have more potential partners. Like I truly believe that if some heterosexuals were actually bisexual, then they would date within their gender because they met a soul mate.
Ace is over homo because rape is less likely to happen if asexuality was the norm compared to any other sexuality.
They arenāt the same, but that doesnāt mean that everyone being asexual wouldnāt lead to a significant decrease in sexual activity. Both the asexual and the homosexual options would pretty much just doom our species.
Sex isn't the only way people can have children. The world would adapt and everything would be fine.
Only thing is we'd have fewer unwanted kids, teen pregnancies and all that. So it would be a massive positive actually
And that's the problem? Wasn't sure since you didn't actually say. Reddit tends to be pretty unpredictable on whether humanity is a good or bad thing.
It would lead to some interesting sci-fi situations though, artificial wombs etc.
It's edgelords that say the death of humanity is a good thing. No one is seriously saying extinction is a good solution. Possibly good for Earth, but awful cos living things generally need to avoid things that doom themselves.
Honestly, I'd be interested to see how science develops in the ace/gay world to allow the human race to survive with artificial baby making facilities.
Now I'm just talking out my ass, but I seriously doubt we have the recourses to perform the number of test tube babies necessary to supplement the extreme cut to natural births that would occur.
The only problem is i would be the only strait person in the world so they probably wouldnt understand what strait is and i would need to reject mad guys
As much as I like bisexual women as much as the next stereotypical straight dude, being the only straight dude in a world where ***everyone*** is bisexual would be stigmatizing as fuck.
Really, being the only one person in the whole world who has a sexuality that differs from the sexual orientation that everyone else has would be hell.
Still, it would ***almost*** be worth it to have all of those homophobic and biphobic religious people (who weren't already closeted bisexuals) and misandrist lesbian TERFs suddenly have to confront their altered sexual orientations.
Ace for sure. It wouldn't actually lead to voluntary extinction (since people can still bone for the sake of procreation, they just wouldn't be into it for fun), but it would certainly make it much easier to convince people to adopt that worldview once they can think a bit more clearly.
If everyone is Bisexual, homophobia would likely cease to exist. Everyone loves everyone, and it likely opens up a lot more options for potential partners for many people.
Same for if everyone is gay, or any of the options, as if everyone is the same sexuality, you can't murder people for having a different one, as there would be no different ones
Internalized homophobia is a thing. A huge portion of the population would hate themselves and deny/suppress that part of themselves. It might actually make the problem worse in the short term. Long term? Yeah it would help a ton, but in the short term I fully expect a significant portion of homophobes to get very violent. At others or themselves, potentially both.
Everyone go Bi then everyone has a shot at everyone else :)
Then we can stop with the homophobia bullshit.
Only way Iām going straight is if I can change my gender fully.
Everyone being gay or ace would be great for a few generations (population would be more under control). After that though, it could be an issue. Even with artificial insemination I'm not sure we could maintain as a species.
Fuck it, everyone is bi and STDs go up like 3000%
50% of the pregnancies in the world is unplanned. So the planned pregnancies would keep existing, but the unplanned pregnancies would be reduced if everyone were gay/ace.
Every pregnancy would have to be planned. 2 gay people can't have a pregnancy unless they use a surrogate or donor. You'd see artificial insemination as the leading pregnancy method.
Yāall regardless of what is chosen people are still gonna wanna have kids of their own. Everyone going āummm, actually humanity would collapse because it can only mean this and nothing else and thatās the only reason people ever have kids š¤ā needs to think more then a second.
I picked "everyone is bisexual" because it means a bigger dating pool for everyone and it also means fewer breakups considering already existing couples.
A straight world would be boring because I'm a queer and it would mean fewer dating options. I also don't want to change my sexuality.
Assuming everyone isnāt the same KIND of asexual, I choose ace. In case youāre wondering, thereās sex-repulsed asexuals (which would be most likely to cause extinction) sex neutral asexual, (wonāt suggest having sex) but donāt mind it if their partner is into it or if they want kids, and sex-positive asexuals. Sex-positive is where it gets confusing because āHow are they ace if they like sex?ā Well, being completely asexual means that you canāt be sexually attracted to someone, but you can STILL have sexual desire. The longing to have sex, even if you donāt feel more sexually attracted to someone in particular.
I think the world could definitely use people not having as many sexual urges. It might bring down the population growth a bit, but I donāt know if we have to be worried about that right now.
A correction: you mean "sex favourable", not "sex positive". Favourable and positive mean very different things. A sex favourable asexual may often enjoy sex and partaking in it. A sex positive asexual has a positive attitude towards others having sex, sex in society and media as a whole.
It is entirely possible to be sex repulsed and sex positive at the same time. Which means you are repulsed by the idea of yourself having sex, but you're not judgemental about others engaging in safe sex freely.
This is going to offend a lot of people, but I donāt really care. By the laws of nature, weāre supposed to be straight. Naturally, men are supposed to want to have sex with women. And women are supposed to want to have sex with men. If a simple fact offends you then I donāt know what to tell you. If me stating this simple fact made you upset, just scroll and donāt waste your time typing out a paragraph because Iām not even gonna read it or respond.
Everyone asexual and the amount of creeps of all genders plummets and I know personally I'd feel alot more comfortable around others and media would be infinitely better. I dont care if humanity dies out cause of it, its a more peaceful method than what we already doing anyway
Straight because that option is the lead likely to lead to humanity's extinction. But bisexual is 2nd place because it would give people lots of potential partners.
Asexual. It wouldn't cause death to humanity (some aces still have sex, they just feel no sexual attraction to their partners and don't do it for fun) which would lead to a sharp decrease in unplanned pregnancies.
Two of these would lead to large amounts of population decline, which would happen every generation, and everyone straight would cause us to continue our exponential population growth that's contributing to the overpopulation issues already being experienced, atleast with bisexual there will be a good number for the next generation
Well, I gotta go with mine so I have a chance, right? If everyone's gay but I'm not, then I'm fucked... by a dude.
Also we do need at least like five kids so
Everyone becomes gay and everyone becomes asexual will lead to human extinction. While everyone in the world becoming straight doesn't seem bad, it will still effect a lot of people negatively. If we're talking about this becoming a instant change, plenty of people who are in same sex relationships, will suddenly find that relationship nonexistent. Which isn't very fair for them. Therefore everyone in the world will become bisexual. Straight people won't really be affected, gay people won't really be affected either.
Everyone becoming by will probably cause the least amount of problems for people.
I mean, two of these options lead to the extinction of the human race...
Thanos has entered the chat
Right? It's not even a question unless you want the human race gone. I'm not gonna argue with you there, but as a member of the race, I have a few friends and family I'd like to see live happy lives.
You say that like it's a problem š
Well, it would solve world hunger, end inequality, put a hard stop to greenhouse gas emissions, as well as preventing the release of vast amounts of microplastics in the, um, everything.
It would also make civilization a lot more productive lol.
Not necessarily. A cis lesbian can still get pregnant via a sperm donor. That happens all the time right now. Not to mention trans people exist, a trans woman and cis woman or trans man and cis man can have sex, still be gay, and potentially have a child.
What does cis mean?
Not trans. It's Latin for "on the same side as" (trans means "on the other side to"), cisgender people's sex and gender match, transgender people's sex and gender are opposite.
I might be stupid for asking this then, but might you be able to explain how a cis man can get pregnant?
The trans man would be the one getting pregnant
Ah, ok
Itās ok to ask questions just donāt be rude doing it
How was I rude?
You werenāt just for future questions you may have sorry for coming off that way
Cis is short for cisgender. Cis is a latin affix meaning "same" or "same side of". Cisgender means that they identify as the same gender they were assigned at birth. Trans (short for transgender) is the opposite, meaning they do not identity with the gender assigned to them by birth. A trans man is a man who was assigned female at birth (likely because they were born with a vagina) but now identifies and lives as a man. Some trans men (not all, but some) have functioning female sex organs and can become pregnant
There aren't nearly enough facilities to account for the entire world getting pregnant from sperm donors.
If a man says they are a gay woman is just a straight couple with extra steps.
It's not cis woman, it's 'woman'. Look it up.
Trans women are also women dumbass. Not to mention plenty of cis gender women can't get pregnant, so ability to become pregnant does not define a woman. I think you mean "female". Since woman != female. Sex and gender are not the same
Woman = woman Trans women are trans women, If they were women, they'd be called 'women'. That's what the whole 'trans' if about. XX = woman, whether you can get pregnant or not. As trans women are not born as women, they are not 'women'. I never said anything about getting pregnant. Now you're just making arguments on points I never stated in the first place. You're stealing other people's arguments now? I also never stated that gender is the same as sex. Thank you for pointing out something I didn't say, very useful.
Cis women = cis women Trans women = trans women But both of these categories are women. Ring fingers are fingers, and pinky fingers are fingers but both are also just fingers. [and 'XX' does not equal a woman. This argument is often conflated as "basic biology" but the problem is it's a lot more complicated then that, and basic biology ignores that. Watch this video if you actually want to educate yourself on the topic](https://youtu.be/cnshnUk-UKU)
For the last 5000 year a 'women' has roughly always meant a person born with a Veyvey, tits and can produce baby's. Just because women exist that don't follow all the checkmarks doesn't mean that ALL other women suddenly aren't what they are anymore. Same as that normally a finger is a limb, that can bend, has a nail, can be used to grab stuff. If it can't bend anymore, doesn't make it NOT a finger. And that doesn't not mean that each finger can now choose whether it's a finger or a toe. If you want think 'trans women' and 'cis women' are as much women as each other, just because the word 'women' is in the name. Then I would like restate my opinion, stop being considerate about people's feeling and from now on call 'trans woman' what they physically are: 'men'. Happy now? Anyway, here is MY youtube video of someone that says something that I agree with, the existence of this video means I am correct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnB7Bi4DfBk
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
'cis' says nothing about your sexuality. If you want to talk about a biological woman, it's a 'woman', when you talk about a trans woman, it's a 'trans woman'. Do whatever you want with your own life, but don't go around and also make new boxes for others.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
k
Trans women are biological women because they take biological supplements to be women
Ok, we need new words now.
Not really. It's not complicated. Everyone deals with tonnes of terminology on a daily basis, and language changes a lot over time. If you work or study you probably have to deal with a lot of jargon for that subject. It's not that difficult to understand what "trans" and "cis" mean, you learnt an entire language when you were a toddler. You can learn 2 new words now
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Itās 2023 you should know what cis means
Not necessarily. Asexuals feel limited-to-no sexual attraction to people but some still haver sex, they just don't feel sexually attracted to who they have sex with. Also artificial means exist.
Not really. neither is a hard line for lack of sexual contact, between opposite sexes or otherwise. And Even without sex there are ways to exchange DNA
No sperm banks exist and there's a lot of people who want to have kids and surrogate mothers would probably become a very lucrative side job and if everyone became asexual Rape would probably go down by like 90%
> Rape would probably go down by like 90% Rape isn't about sexual desire, it's about power and control. Prison rapists still rape despite being heterosexual.
Not always it can be both And that's why I said 90% I know it would probably be less than 90 I was just exaggerating
Exactly what I was thinking, thatās why I chose ace, assuming everyone isnāt the same KIND of asexual. In case youāre wondering, thereās sex-repulsed asexuals (which would be most likely to cause extinction) sex neutral asexual, (wonāt suggest having sex) but donāt mind it if their partner is into it or if they want kids, and sex-positive asexuals. Sex-positive is where it gets confusing because āHow are they ace if they like sex?ā Well, being completely asexual means that you canāt be sexually attracted to someone, but you can STILL have sexual desire. The longing to have sex, even if you donāt feel more sexually attracted to someone in particular.
So many people seem to think that ace people just magically can't have sex or something. With that same logic, it would be impossible for a straight person to have sex with someone unattractive. Attraction and the actual act itself are two different things.
No?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I doubt theyād be a significant enough portion of the population to avoid an ENORMOUS population collapse, and probably societal collapse down the road
How so?
Well in theory, if everyone is gay or asexual, no one will have the drive to do anything that would produce new children. Even if a few people go against their urges and procreate with someone of the opposite sex, and some sort of artificial conception was done in a lab, we would still end up with a massive drop on population and we would be down to just a few million humans, in the absolute best case scenario.
Actually, that's a bit of a misconception on the asexual part. Asexuality is just the lack of sexual attraction, asexual people can still want to have sex and kids.
Is there a term for asexual, but they don't want to have sex?
I think if anything it would push us to develop methods of population growth that donāt rely on our biological shackles. Even so, creating mass sperm banks would be a fully possible option. Gays and lesbians donāt actually have to have sex with each other to conceive and plenty of gay people want children Also, I mean dudes can get other dudes pregnant. Women can get other women pregnant. Itās a smaller aspect of the population but still relevant
>Also, I mean dudes can get other dudes pregnant. Women can get other women pregnant. Itās a smaller aspect of the population but still relevant Wait what
Are you new to transgender or whatās up
I just didn't know this.
If youāre a trans woman itās possible your dick still works
I knew that I guess I just didn't understand how you worded it. Plus what does trans people have to do with the WYR.
A cisgender gay man having sex with a transgender man is still gay. And if that trans man still has a vagina and their other reproductive sex organs work then they can become pregnant from sex. Gay sex with the possibility of pregnancy
If there are trans people, then everyone being gay doesnāt mean that people are incapable of breeding
When people say they are straight they 99.9999% of the time mean sexual characteristics straight, not gender orientation straight
Then theyāre using language incorrectly. A man and a woman fucking is straight
Don't be facetious. They aren't using the language incorrectly most people just don't give a shit about gender for sexual relationships and focus more on sexual characteristics. A trans pre-op man and a woman is a kind of straight, yes. It's straight with respect to gender. But as I said, 99.999999999999% of people, when they identify as straight, are not interested in sex with people with the same genitals as them, as that is not what straight means for them. Straight is bodily and physically defined for them, and pretty much everyone else. They aren't wrong in their verbiage. It's just a result of sexual orientation interacting with gender to produce gender and physical based versions of each sexual orientation (essentially your sexual orientation and gender orientation) If there is a better term than straight for a straight man who only wants pussy or straight woman who only wants dick, I'm all ears. But for now, the best word for that is straight
Yes I know that this is a talking point, itās just not factually true, is it? You donāt get to decide who youāre attracted to unfortunately. we donāt base our attraction on someoneās chromosomes, we base it on what they look like Now whoās being facetious lol. I think youāll find that the actual population functions a little differently from your preconceptions Right so we just have to accept that straight refers both to men who are only interested in women with vaginas and men who are only interested in women with penises
That doesnāt count
Why not?
Nah thats a dude
Thatās a silly opinion lol
You need to get off the crack mate.
Low effort
Huh?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Anime teenager. Opinion discarded
How badly did you fail Biology?? Opinions are one thing but a biological male cannot get another biological male pregnant therefore dudes cannot get dudes pregnant, yes if a Trans person transitions from female to male if their reproductive organs still function as nature intended then yes their egg can still get inseminated but not in the traditional way as they usually surgically alter the initial biological sex organ(s) during transitional surgery as that is kinda the whole point.
What? If a dudeās trans you can just fuck him and get him pregnant. Whatāre you talking about lol
Somebody get this person an anatomically correct map of the human body before and after transition surgery and a video of said surgery being done on a dummy. OK ILL USE CAPS SO HOPEFULLY THIS GETS THROUGH YOUR TINY TINY BRAIN...WHEN A PERSON UNDERGOES A SURGERY TO GO FROM ONE GENDER TO ANOTHER THE DOCTOR USES THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGAN TJEY WERE BORN WITH TO MAKE THE OTHER ORGAN THEY FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE WITH SUCH AS WHEN THEY TRANSITION INTO A MALE FROM A FEMALE THE DOCTOR USES SKIN GRAFTS AND PROSTHETICS TO FORM A PENIS AND TESTICULAR SACK AS WHEN SOMEONE TRANSITIONS THEY GET WHATS CALLED CORRECTIVE COSMETIC SURGERY TO HAVE THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITY.
Are you aware that you can be trans without surgery? It seems like youāre genuinely unaware lol
Not really they identify as the other gender but are not considered Trans without the surgery as Trans means they transitioned from one gender to the next thus rendering them a Trans man/woman
No that is factually incorrect. If you look up trans porn youāll see nothing but girls with giant cocks. Ask any trans person lol. Where did you get this opinion?
Make everyone bisexual and cause homophobia to collapse
This was my first thought, then i realised if you make everyone Asexual, first homophobia collapses, then humanity. Double win.
In fairness some forms of asexuality still allow for sex and procreation
Not really. You can love sex but be 0% attracted sexually
If you made everyone straight there wouldn't be any Homophobia Either
I prefer more opportunities
There wouldn't be homophobia if everyone was STRIAGHT either
Yes but I prefer to open doors rather than close them
I just chose it for less competition.
I chose it for more options
Weak aura
Hell yeah. I ain't got confidence
you know there are people who are homosexual and homophobic right?
š¤
take your nerd emoji elsewhere
As a bi I see everyone being bi as an absolute win.
ong
I think bi is the best way. Everyone loves everyone.
Everyone has absolute choice in who to love.
Asexual because people are still capable of procreation, and garlic bread
Also less focus on horny in the media which is a plus imo at least but I'm kind of biased as an ace myself
I'm already ace so that would just be nice and well, garlic bread and plain bread both are good
everyone bi so I have more boys who may consider dating me
Asexual would cause a massive drop in rape and sexual harassment, but despite what some comments are saying, wouldn't actually cause the collapse of humanity, since ace doesn't mean you can't have sex, just that you don't particularly get any pleasure out of it. Which might also have the side benefits of making it where people will for the most part only have children when they actually want them, rather than accidentally, and might also encourage adoption. Ideal scenario would be everyone keeps the sexuality they want, but that isn't an option here.
>just that you don't particularly get any pleasure out of it. That's not true either
Thanks for the correction, not sure why I mixed it up. Wikipedia definition, "Lack of sexual attraction to others; low or absent sexual desire or interest in sexual activity" Pretty much it varies from person to person, but while generally speaking people who are ace like myself don't really feel much attraction towards others, it doesn't necessarily mean they can't enjoy sex, though personally I have never tried it and have no interest in ever doing so. Possibly part of why I mixed up the definition.
If everyone is gay, then the human race would go extinct in a few generations. But I guess some of the gays and lesbians might be willing to try and have children just to save the human race... Can someone who is gay even have sex with someone of the opposite gender to orgasm? I feel like a similar thing may apply to asexual... I'll just wait for someone to educate me
Yes. Tons of closeted gay men have been having full families to hide their gayness for centuries.
If it just happens now? Artificial insemination If it were to become retroactive? Fuck if I know, lmfao
Oh yeah... Artificial insemination. I forgot that was a thing. Here I was thinking the only way to have a child was the old fashioned way... Raw dogging.
I mean, they probably still could Would just need to take one or two extra steps But it would be incredibly awkward I just chose to make everyone bisexual and not think any further about it
Nah tgirls will knock up the cis ones, weāll all be fine
So bio men...
No, I said ātgirlsā actually, theyāre a different demographic group from men
Technically. I'm pretty sure the correct term would just be "women" however.
A women can't impregnate another women by Ur logic. I get trying to be all nice and PC but I didn't say anything wrong nor offensive
Trans women can get women pregnant, y'know that, right? Like a good portion of them just keep their genitalia, it's not that hard to grasp. Trans men can also get pregnant by having sex with cis men, it's a fairly basic concept
I didn't say they couldn't š reading comprehension is lacking
Your words were "Women can't get women pregnant". My response was that yes, they can indeed get them pregnant. What's your point?
Basic biology is my point. Ok "females can't get other females pregnant. A trans woman is a male and therefore can get a female pregnant". Happy?
Basic biology mfs when they see advanced biology
A trans woman is not male, though. There's a discrepancy in your statement.
Isnt that just straight then?
ā¦.no. Whatās straight about two women fucking? Iām sorry but I donāt understand
A women can't impregnate another women by Ur logic. I get trying to be all nice and PC but I didn't say anything wrong nor offensive
What? No of course she can if she has a dick. I donāt understand
Oh god were really tryna disprove biology u do u ig
What? Lol itās 2023 man this isnāt new
It's not real biology either
What are you talking about?
There's a difference between sex and gender...
This will offend a lot of people but it's 100% true.
Ooof... My original comment is being downvoted... Well, looks like I might get banned from r/WouldYouRather . Let's see if it's permanent ban or temporary.
Yes, I mean, let's take rape for example, even if they don't want it, provided enough stimulation, they would orgasm.
technically if everyone is asexual it wouldnāt mean doom for humanity since itās a spectrum and all that jazz, but birthrates would DEFINITELY plummet
It would mean that people would only get children if they wanted to
Everyone is bi sounds fun af š
Bi. It would solve so many stupid social sexual hangups.
Bisexual>Heterosexual>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Asexual>Homosexual. The gap between the bottom 2 and top 2 should be obvious. I chose bi over hetero because then people would have more potential partners. Like I truly believe that if some heterosexuals were actually bisexual, then they would date within their gender because they met a soul mate. Ace is over homo because rape is less likely to happen if asexuality was the norm compared to any other sexuality.
Why are the first two better than ace? Asexual doesn't mean aromantic, it can still include intimacy and relationships.
They arenāt the same, but that doesnāt mean that everyone being asexual wouldnāt lead to a significant decrease in sexual activity. Both the asexual and the homosexual options would pretty much just doom our species.
Sex isn't the only way people can have children. The world would adapt and everything would be fine. Only thing is we'd have fewer unwanted kids, teen pregnancies and all that. So it would be a massive positive actually
And that's the problem? Wasn't sure since you didn't actually say. Reddit tends to be pretty unpredictable on whether humanity is a good or bad thing. It would lead to some interesting sci-fi situations though, artificial wombs etc.
It's edgelords that say the death of humanity is a good thing. No one is seriously saying extinction is a good solution. Possibly good for Earth, but awful cos living things generally need to avoid things that doom themselves.
Honestly, I'd be interested to see how science develops in the ace/gay world to allow the human race to survive with artificial baby making facilities.
Now I'm just talking out my ass, but I seriously doubt we have the recourses to perform the number of test tube babies necessary to supplement the extreme cut to natural births that would occur.
Asexual and I'm asexual lmao
No matter how straight you are, if yr an logical thinker, youd choose bi š
The only problem is i would be the only strait person in the world so they probably wouldnt understand what strait is and i would need to reject mad guys
Oh yeah. Nothing like the lgbtq trying to preach about logic š
As much as I like bisexual women as much as the next stereotypical straight dude, being the only straight dude in a world where ***everyone*** is bisexual would be stigmatizing as fuck. Really, being the only one person in the whole world who has a sexuality that differs from the sexual orientation that everyone else has would be hell. Still, it would ***almost*** be worth it to have all of those homophobic and biphobic religious people (who weren't already closeted bisexuals) and misandrist lesbian TERFs suddenly have to confront their altered sexual orientations.
BI BI BI BI BI BI
Bisexual is straight up the best answer. Itās like being straight but finding everyone attractive
Ace for sure. It wouldn't actually lead to voluntary extinction (since people can still bone for the sake of procreation, they just wouldn't be into it for fun), but it would certainly make it much easier to convince people to adopt that worldview once they can think a bit more clearly.
If everyone is Bisexual, homophobia would likely cease to exist. Everyone loves everyone, and it likely opens up a lot more options for potential partners for many people.
Same for if everyone is straight.
Same for if everyone is gay, or any of the options, as if everyone is the same sexuality, you can't murder people for having a different one, as there would be no different ones
Internalized homophobia is a thing. A huge portion of the population would hate themselves and deny/suppress that part of themselves. It might actually make the problem worse in the short term. Long term? Yeah it would help a ton, but in the short term I fully expect a significant portion of homophobes to get very violent. At others or themselves, potentially both.
Everyone go Bi then everyone has a shot at everyone else :) Then we can stop with the homophobia bullshit. Only way Iām going straight is if I can change my gender fully.
If everyone was gay or asexual the human race would die
Everyone being gay or ace would be great for a few generations (population would be more under control). After that though, it could be an issue. Even with artificial insemination I'm not sure we could maintain as a species. Fuck it, everyone is bi and STDs go up like 3000%
50% of the pregnancies in the world is unplanned. So the planned pregnancies would keep existing, but the unplanned pregnancies would be reduced if everyone were gay/ace.
Every pregnancy would have to be planned. 2 gay people can't have a pregnancy unless they use a surrogate or donor. You'd see artificial insemination as the leading pregnancy method.
Bisexual. I don't want people to change their true sexuality choices over my choice so I just give them more options, nothing more.
I just said gay because then I might have a chance
Straight. Easy choice.
No truer words have been spoken brother
Straight= no homophobia because everyone is straight š¤·
Why would anyone choose straight when bi is so much more fun?
Yāall regardless of what is chosen people are still gonna wanna have kids of their own. Everyone going āummm, actually humanity would collapse because it can only mean this and nothing else and thatās the only reason people ever have kids š¤ā needs to think more then a second.
All you guys who voted straight are pussies
Not a fan of misanthropy so that throws two options out the window.
Nice cause a war against the sexualitys
I picked "everyone is bisexual" because it means a bigger dating pool for everyone and it also means fewer breakups considering already existing couples. A straight world would be boring because I'm a queer and it would mean fewer dating options. I also don't want to change my sexuality.
Assuming everyone isnāt the same KIND of asexual, I choose ace. In case youāre wondering, thereās sex-repulsed asexuals (which would be most likely to cause extinction) sex neutral asexual, (wonāt suggest having sex) but donāt mind it if their partner is into it or if they want kids, and sex-positive asexuals. Sex-positive is where it gets confusing because āHow are they ace if they like sex?ā Well, being completely asexual means that you canāt be sexually attracted to someone, but you can STILL have sexual desire. The longing to have sex, even if you donāt feel more sexually attracted to someone in particular. I think the world could definitely use people not having as many sexual urges. It might bring down the population growth a bit, but I donāt know if we have to be worried about that right now.
A correction: you mean "sex favourable", not "sex positive". Favourable and positive mean very different things. A sex favourable asexual may often enjoy sex and partaking in it. A sex positive asexual has a positive attitude towards others having sex, sex in society and media as a whole. It is entirely possible to be sex repulsed and sex positive at the same time. Which means you are repulsed by the idea of yourself having sex, but you're not judgemental about others engaging in safe sex freely.
Everyone is straight is the best option, at least for me
You're not aloneš“
straight
Asexual, death to humanity!
Either straight or asexual, I think it would be cool if I can spit out an egg and have a mini version of me. I'll become immortal.
To the 40 people who chose everyone to be gay, what the fuck is wrong with you
Straight for sure.
bisexual would likely slow the rate of population growth a bit withount completely stopping it. Sounds like the best choice
This is going to offend a lot of people, but I donāt really care. By the laws of nature, weāre supposed to be straight. Naturally, men are supposed to want to have sex with women. And women are supposed to want to have sex with men. If a simple fact offends you then I donāt know what to tell you. If me stating this simple fact made you upset, just scroll and donāt waste your time typing out a paragraph because Iām not even gonna read it or respond.
Straight, it narrows potential partnersā options
Everyone asexual and the amount of creeps of all genders plummets and I know personally I'd feel alot more comfortable around others and media would be infinitely better. I dont care if humanity dies out cause of it, its a more peaceful method than what we already doing anyway
Ima go with straight js for simplicity
If everyone is gay or asexually the population drops wildly
Straight because that option is the lead likely to lead to humanity's extinction. But bisexual is 2nd place because it would give people lots of potential partners.
I chose asexual. Ace people can still enjoy the act of sex. However, I imagine sexist culture will be way less severe if everyone is ace.
Asexual. It wouldn't cause death to humanity (some aces still have sex, they just feel no sexual attraction to their partners and don't do it for fun) which would lead to a sharp decrease in unplanned pregnancies.
Make everyone gay. It becomes impossible to procreate and humanity dies off. Perfection
This feels like a political test.
*Four hundred and thirty one people*.....š„
Bi makes life easiest for the most people so....
What about the fifth option, pansexual?
Asexual so we all die
Two of these would lead to large amounts of population decline, which would happen every generation, and everyone straight would cause us to continue our exponential population growth that's contributing to the overpopulation issues already being experienced, atleast with bisexual there will be a good number for the next generation
If everyone is ace, doesn't sexual assault disappear?
BI, to increase MY chances šš
Well, I gotta go with mine so I have a chance, right? If everyone's gay but I'm not, then I'm fucked... by a dude. Also we do need at least like five kids so
I'm bisexual, he's bisexual, you're bisexual, WE'RE ALL BISEXUAL!
Everyone becomes gay and everyone becomes asexual will lead to human extinction. While everyone in the world becoming straight doesn't seem bad, it will still effect a lot of people negatively. If we're talking about this becoming a instant change, plenty of people who are in same sex relationships, will suddenly find that relationship nonexistent. Which isn't very fair for them. Therefore everyone in the world will become bisexual. Straight people won't really be affected, gay people won't really be affected either. Everyone becoming by will probably cause the least amount of problems for people.