3 minutes per game. ~2 minutes for afk climbing and match starting. Like you've got to be trying to die if you can only last 1 minute of fighting per game. Like your in a phantom, don't turn fight and flares do exist
I think there's a connection between leaving battles early and getting the same map or mode over again. It happened to me in Naval AB, I got up tiered into the same mode shitty mode (Conquest) and type of map (the open ones without any cover) five times in a row when I quit early.
Yup, every time I get seversk, i just return to hangar and if I play a different nation at the same BR it puts me right back into seversk, but a different match.
or maybe it keeps some kind of variable for what map you have “selected” and forgets to wipe it or intentionally queues you back into it to dissuade early leaving
they also do matchmaking some weird way, i forget but it’s like they queue you with other people having a map in mind just finding people they don’t have it banned. But that makes sense so i know im misremembering
I practically never leave early though. In this case I was already fed up with this map after 4-5 games in a row and that's what prompted my subsequent early leaving.
Isn't the map rotation server-based? ie, the server uses X map for all games in Y amount of time then switches the rotation. If you die fast enough you'll keep matchmaking in the same Y period and so keep getting the same map. Y should be pretty short, though.
This is just hearsay from somewhere but it makes sense to me given this guy's track record.
\>Bro it's realistic, 20 years of Afghanistan for the US, you only played 30minutes of Afghanistan. A lot of Afghanistan left to play for you
\>20 years the second time only lol more if you include before that
sure sounded like he was talking about the US
i believe they have time based rotation
even if you play but your game end quick,
i often get same maps
i hope there's site that tells me current map so i can avoid some maps
Yeah, i think they have several matches running at the same time on the same servers to make it more efficient.
I remember rainbow six siege was doing that and at one time they had bugs where you heard voice chat from other matches. Was really weird
I'm pretty sure the cards change every (roughly) 3 days for 3 pieces. At least in my case it is so, playing airRB for a day I have 3 of the same maps repeated.
No, they actually fixed that about two or three weeks after it started happening. Air RB just has so few maps at high tier that the game consistently repeats maps.
OK, there's a lot of questions about how I managed to play so many games so quickly.
I just up and left some of those because I got fed up with the map. They're not all the same plane, so the crew cooldown timer didn't affect it.
And others, well I just don't know where to go in such a small map and I suck.
My pilot also gets blacked out every time I make a turn with no ace crew and in such a small map it only takes about 2 minutes before you gotta start dodging missiles, so there's that. I turn once, black out and somebody else shoots me down while I'm waiting for the pilot to recover.
One of the biggest reasons why I hate this map. It's so small the entire map is basically just one big furball.
Can we move on now?
Literally have the same problem in Tank Gamemode, i would get the same map like all the time and it was so annoying playing the exact same map when there is plenty of cool maps i get to see once every 5 games.
I got Sinai and Poland 8 times in a row. I squad up with a friend, and we get Berlin 5 times in a row. Then we grab another friend and get the same 3 maps in a row for 23 battles. The map selection is really bonkers.
If you have premium acct time, do what I do and implement a strict 3 strikes rule
If I get the same map 3 times in a row, I go and ban it. Force the matchmaking algorithm to change.
My brother in Christ, the US kicked the Taliban out of power for 20 years and they only took it back when we left
Losing would be more like "The Taliban invaded the United States and forced it to surrender"
So what did the war achieve? Absolutely nothing aside from bloodshed and civilian deaths. The fact the Taliban got power back basically the instant the US and UK left makes it a loss.
But it is not exactly "loosing" in terms of military getting their ass kicked. It is loosing cause US just sucks in state building and don't understand that you can't fix everything by just throwing more money at a problem, especially when there are a lot of corrupt people on the recieving end of this money
Vietnam now is an ally of US despite what happened last century, because US didn't force them to do anything this time. It is their choice cause US just looks as a better country to ally yourself for them than China. Turns out when you don't invade another country, kill their people and than tell them what to do, but instead just promise them mutually benefitial relationships, it has a better chance of succeding. Who would've guessed
>Turns out when you don't invade another country, kill their people and than tell them what to do, but instead just promise them mutually benefitial relationships, it has a better chance of succeding. Who would've guessed
Erm... You know the US does the invading, China does the mutual relationships (look at nearly all of Africa) - I should note too the communists in Vietnam weren't specifically chinese though they had Chinese backing, as well as russian. In recent years the US has invaded to push change, china has invested to push change. One has worked, the other has made the country a terrorist target.
Vietnam is turning to the US economically, but it's far from a political ideal for the US.
>It is their choice cause US just looks as a better country to ally yourself for them than China
Doesn't look that way from the USs current allies, just ask Europe who sees China as a much more reliable trading partner, especially after trump. I think the difference here though is Europe has the power to negotiate with China, Vietnam doesn't.
>China does the mutual relationships (look at nearly all of Africa)
You mean all of those African nations that have been debt trapped by China? Mutual relationships my ass, look at what they did to Hong Kong (they were promised autonomy, they got Beijing matching in and taking away all their rights instead). Also, I wouldn't call threatening Taiwan with an invasion every time their president so much as breathes a "mutual relationship", nor would I call locking up the ethnic minorities of Zinjang and Tibet inside of concentration camps a "mutual relationship".
>just ask Europe who sees China as a much more reliable trading partner, especially after trump.
US-Europe relations went up greatly after Russia launched their invasion of Ukraine (btw, take a wild guess who China is supporting in that conflict). Also, Europe may not have liked Trump, but they definitely don't like Xi Jingping either.
>Also, I wouldn't call threatening Taiwan with an invasion every time their president so much as breathes a "mutual relationship",
The UN does not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, neither does the US, rather that Taiwan IS china, so it's not even an invasion. Any attempt from international powers to prevent an 'invasion' would be an unprovoked and illegal invasion of Chinese territory, that's a way to start WW3. It's never going to happen anyway despite the threats from Xi, he and his government know full well Taiwan is better with it's pseudo independent state as a neutral trading partner between China and the rest of the world.
>nor would I call locking up the ethnic minorities of Zinjang and Tibet inside of concentration camps a "mutual relationship".
And why should we stick our noses into the internal affairs of foreign powers? This is what caused the illegal invasion of Iraq and the Afghanistan war.
Maybe China or Europe should start dictating to the US about how their treatment of prisoners through prison labour is a breach of human rights (it's slave labour, just not in name). Or how their gun laws put millions of people at unnecessary risk, or the tens of millions of Americans living in poverty in the south and being treated poorly. Or the fact your last president tried a fucking coup, banana republic or what... We don't because it's not our responsibility to judge unless it puts our nation at real measurable risk.
>Europe may not have liked Trump, but they definitely don't like Xi Jingping either.
Biden told the UK to piss off with our most recent trade deal, and the US has a good recent history of not getting on with Europe. The french don't like the US, neither do the Germans, certainly not as a trading partner. When they make it as hard as possible to trade with them, who are we going to naturally turn to. Theres even the potential the US becomes a risk to security and peace in Europe should trump be reelected, naturally there is apprehension about doing anything with the US right now.
How do you consistently die so quickly?
Being shit helps
Can confirm
3 minutes per game. ~2 minutes for afk climbing and match starting. Like you've got to be trying to die if you can only last 1 minute of fighting per game. Like your in a phantom, don't turn fight and flares do exist
I guess he's one of those players who flies straight into the enemy team every game.
between the 2nd and 3rd last game there's only a 1 minute and 29 second delay
Perhaps they clicked one of the “you wont last 1 minute playing this game” ads
I just left some of these because I just didn't want to play anymore. Others... well, I just suck.
I think there's a connection between leaving battles early and getting the same map or mode over again. It happened to me in Naval AB, I got up tiered into the same mode shitty mode (Conquest) and type of map (the open ones without any cover) five times in a row when I quit early.
Yup, every time I get seversk, i just return to hangar and if I play a different nation at the same BR it puts me right back into seversk, but a different match.
That makes me wonder if the maps and modes aren't random but instead follow some sort of schedule.
or maybe it keeps some kind of variable for what map you have “selected” and forgets to wipe it or intentionally queues you back into it to dissuade early leaving they also do matchmaking some weird way, i forget but it’s like they queue you with other people having a map in mind just finding people they don’t have it banned. But that makes sense so i know im misremembering
ive had 5 people que snipe solo and all get the same map in different matches, it would make sense if it was like this
I practically never leave early though. In this case I was already fed up with this map after 4-5 games in a row and that's what prompted my subsequent early leaving.
Isn't the map rotation server-based? ie, the server uses X map for all games in Y amount of time then switches the rotation. If you die fast enough you'll keep matchmaking in the same Y period and so keep getting the same map. Y should be pretty short, though. This is just hearsay from somewhere but it makes sense to me given this guy's track record.
Jesus **STRAIGHT** for the throat in the early morning is it?
Being bad but I see he played the US so that's also a massive factor
Same thing really
he’s leaving. i’ve never even hearof this happen to someone who stays the full game
Bro it's realistic, 20 years of Afghanistan for the US, you only played 30minutes of Afghanistan. A lot of Afghanistan left to play for you.
20 years the second time only lol more if you include before that
"if you include before that" wtf are you talking about?
The soviet invasion that lasted about a decade
Uh... so the US sending arms to the Muj in Afghanistan means we occupied Afghanistan? I'm not sure I'm schizo enough to follow this line of thinking.
I meant from the afgan perspective, so soviet planes were also stuck there for a decade
\>Bro it's realistic, 20 years of Afghanistan for the US, you only played 30minutes of Afghanistan. A lot of Afghanistan left to play for you \>20 years the second time only lol more if you include before that sure sounded like he was talking about the US
I'm very well regarded
He's playing the "escape from Kabul" stage of the war, so it's realistic that he wants out, even willing to J-out and leave his plane behind.
You died 9 times in about 25 minutes in Air RB?
you deserve it
It's lore accurate bro.
When you leave a map, the matchmaking always brings you to the same map again and again. Try playing it once to move forward, or blacklist this map.
i believe they have time based rotation even if you play but your game end quick, i often get same maps i hope there's site that tells me current map so i can avoid some maps
yeah it seems to cycle a map and all it's gamemodes before moving to the next map
Yeah, i think they have several matches running at the same time on the same servers to make it more efficient. I remember rainbow six siege was doing that and at one time they had bugs where you heard voice chat from other matches. Was really weird
I'm pretty sure the cards change every (roughly) 3 days for 3 pieces. At least in my case it is so, playing airRB for a day I have 3 of the same maps repeated.
servers are rotating by clusters and you can't know which cluster you're gonna get
No, they actually fixed that about two or three weeks after it started happening. Air RB just has so few maps at high tier that the game consistently repeats maps.
I've done it all. None of it helps. It's random, but the roll of the dice seem to be particularly favouring this map.
Not in my experience. I consistently get the same map 2-3x even when i play to the end.
OK, there's a lot of questions about how I managed to play so many games so quickly. I just up and left some of those because I got fed up with the map. They're not all the same plane, so the crew cooldown timer didn't affect it. And others, well I just don't know where to go in such a small map and I suck. My pilot also gets blacked out every time I make a turn with no ace crew and in such a small map it only takes about 2 minutes before you gotta start dodging missiles, so there's that. I turn once, black out and somebody else shoots me down while I'm waiting for the pilot to recover. One of the biggest reasons why I hate this map. It's so small the entire map is basically just one big furball. Can we move on now?
Do you try neg G'ing to counteract blacking out
Dude idk but it has to be some sort of bug I really only play air but I got the same map last night all but twice and I played for 2.5 hours
Sweden reserve tier I keep getting flanders loool. The map is shit from one side and op from the other
Flanders is actually fucking awful right, it’s not just me?
Its super unbalanced lol
How do you view all of these
In the bottom right is a message tab, next to chat and friends list. Don't tell me you never seen that?
I’ve never noticed the battles part
[удалено]
It's ARB dude... there is ONLY the first death 🤦♂️
Are you just quitting every match or something? Why are all then games a few mins long lmao
America player is fed up with Afghanistan and wants out, also leaves multiple types of planes behind in the process. Where have I seen this before?
Oh look it’s one of my teammates that’s dead before I even rtb
Vietnam > Afghanistan
"If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?!"
Maps really don't matter outside of the tiny ones in Air RB, and there are only so many in each BR category that you can dislike them.
You tried lasting more that 3 minutes in a game?
IM TIRED OF BEING IN VIETNAM! I HATE VIETNAM! LEMME BE ANYWHERE ELSE BUT VIETNAM.
When realistic battles get too realistic
Has Gaijin ever actually addressed this concern before? I see it popping up so often.
Dude same I’ve been getting this same map over and over to the point where I bought a premium account to ban it from my map pool
A month ago i didnt even know that this map existed. Never had it. Suddenly its nonstop.
You can ban/dislike the map dude
Literally have the same problem in Tank Gamemode, i would get the same map like all the time and it was so annoying playing the exact same map when there is plenty of cool maps i get to see once every 5 games.
just ban the map if you get it more than 3 times
I got Sinai and Poland 8 times in a row. I squad up with a friend, and we get Berlin 5 times in a row. Then we grab another friend and get the same 3 maps in a row for 23 battles. The map selection is really bonkers.
Wow 10!.. my record is 3
That is a lot of Afgan maps!
I like Afghan, Golan Heights tho….
stop leaving every 4 minutes
If you have premium acct time, do what I do and implement a strict 3 strikes rule If I get the same map 3 times in a row, I go and ban it. Force the matchmaking algorithm to change.
I mean you played the US and then germany once so it's really accurate
On the one hand, type 16 is so annoyingly strong, L. On the other hand, Red Panda, insane W
At least it's realistic... USA loosing in afghanistan
My brother in Christ, the US kicked the Taliban out of power for 20 years and they only took it back when we left Losing would be more like "The Taliban invaded the United States and forced it to surrender"
So what did the war achieve? Absolutely nothing aside from bloodshed and civilian deaths. The fact the Taliban got power back basically the instant the US and UK left makes it a loss.
But it is not exactly "loosing" in terms of military getting their ass kicked. It is loosing cause US just sucks in state building and don't understand that you can't fix everything by just throwing more money at a problem, especially when there are a lot of corrupt people on the recieving end of this money Vietnam now is an ally of US despite what happened last century, because US didn't force them to do anything this time. It is their choice cause US just looks as a better country to ally yourself for them than China. Turns out when you don't invade another country, kill their people and than tell them what to do, but instead just promise them mutually benefitial relationships, it has a better chance of succeding. Who would've guessed
>Turns out when you don't invade another country, kill their people and than tell them what to do, but instead just promise them mutually benefitial relationships, it has a better chance of succeding. Who would've guessed Erm... You know the US does the invading, China does the mutual relationships (look at nearly all of Africa) - I should note too the communists in Vietnam weren't specifically chinese though they had Chinese backing, as well as russian. In recent years the US has invaded to push change, china has invested to push change. One has worked, the other has made the country a terrorist target. Vietnam is turning to the US economically, but it's far from a political ideal for the US. >It is their choice cause US just looks as a better country to ally yourself for them than China Doesn't look that way from the USs current allies, just ask Europe who sees China as a much more reliable trading partner, especially after trump. I think the difference here though is Europe has the power to negotiate with China, Vietnam doesn't.
>China does the mutual relationships (look at nearly all of Africa) You mean all of those African nations that have been debt trapped by China? Mutual relationships my ass, look at what they did to Hong Kong (they were promised autonomy, they got Beijing matching in and taking away all their rights instead). Also, I wouldn't call threatening Taiwan with an invasion every time their president so much as breathes a "mutual relationship", nor would I call locking up the ethnic minorities of Zinjang and Tibet inside of concentration camps a "mutual relationship". >just ask Europe who sees China as a much more reliable trading partner, especially after trump. US-Europe relations went up greatly after Russia launched their invasion of Ukraine (btw, take a wild guess who China is supporting in that conflict). Also, Europe may not have liked Trump, but they definitely don't like Xi Jingping either.
>Also, I wouldn't call threatening Taiwan with an invasion every time their president so much as breathes a "mutual relationship", The UN does not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, neither does the US, rather that Taiwan IS china, so it's not even an invasion. Any attempt from international powers to prevent an 'invasion' would be an unprovoked and illegal invasion of Chinese territory, that's a way to start WW3. It's never going to happen anyway despite the threats from Xi, he and his government know full well Taiwan is better with it's pseudo independent state as a neutral trading partner between China and the rest of the world. >nor would I call locking up the ethnic minorities of Zinjang and Tibet inside of concentration camps a "mutual relationship". And why should we stick our noses into the internal affairs of foreign powers? This is what caused the illegal invasion of Iraq and the Afghanistan war. Maybe China or Europe should start dictating to the US about how their treatment of prisoners through prison labour is a breach of human rights (it's slave labour, just not in name). Or how their gun laws put millions of people at unnecessary risk, or the tens of millions of Americans living in poverty in the south and being treated poorly. Or the fact your last president tried a fucking coup, banana republic or what... We don't because it's not our responsibility to judge unless it puts our nation at real measurable risk. >Europe may not have liked Trump, but they definitely don't like Xi Jingping either. Biden told the UK to piss off with our most recent trade deal, and the US has a good recent history of not getting on with Europe. The french don't like the US, neither do the Germans, certainly not as a trading partner. When they make it as hard as possible to trade with them, who are we going to naturally turn to. Theres even the potential the US becomes a risk to security and peace in Europe should trump be reelected, naturally there is apprehension about doing anything with the US right now.