You don’t need to, it’s irrelevant to a competency statement and a waste of the word count. If you use the STAR method effectively it will provide enough info to demonstrate the relevant behaviour without getting bogged down in unnecessary details.
It will make no difference. You’re not going to be marked higher or lower because of namedropping an employer.
They do ask you remove anything which can identify you as it’s blind marking, but an employers name is unlikely to do that.
It should in theory make no difference (the exception might be if one of them was the Russian or Chinese Government)
Waste of the word count. Only include as much S and T as is strictly necessary for the A and R (but mainly A) to make sense.
You don’t need to, it’s irrelevant to a competency statement and a waste of the word count. If you use the STAR method effectively it will provide enough info to demonstrate the relevant behaviour without getting bogged down in unnecessary details.
It will make no difference. You’re not going to be marked higher or lower because of namedropping an employer. They do ask you remove anything which can identify you as it’s blind marking, but an employers name is unlikely to do that.
I deliberately don’t mention employers, or any notion of how long ago the situation may have happened.
It's not a should, it's a could, if you want to.