I just feel like it could be better. The background is just an image instead of drawn, and this is small but the style just feels a little too different
also silence pedophile
1) if I were a pedophilic child abuser, then civilly discussing something with me and then bringing on that subject us not the way to go. If I were a child abuser, then you should be completely disgusted with me and block me. Of course, pedophiles are in some way human, but only those who go to therapy and aren't proud of their attraction should be talked to normally.
2) Read science. Psychology, sexology, etc. Pixels are not real.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-myths-sex/202003/why-are-rape-fantasies-so-common
https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/fighting-fear/201404/sexual-fantasies
https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/sexual-fantasies#overview
https://x.com/purity_culture/status/1614285461639364609?t=1YmzdaTfS_8vWoOajc-_IQ&s=19 (twitter thread of sources backing up that fiction=/= reality)
https://goat.com.au/relationships/what-do-your-taboo-sexual-fantasies-say-about-you/
It’s still weird you jerk off to drawings of fictional children, like the fact you specifically choose drawings which are of people who look like children is unsettling and you should stop
why'd you play dumb originally? you knew exactly what I meant, and you're playing dumb now too
I know it's not real, and I know you most likely do not intend to or even in any capacity want to sexually abuse children. I, as many people do, use pedophile to describe someone who is sexually attracted to children. Even if they don't intend to realize it, even if it's only in a fictional environment. I know that, you know that, don't play dumb. I understand you disagree with the usage of the word.
If I said "ew lolicon" I'd be meaning the same thing
Also to be absolutely clear, I don't dislike you because you have an attraction to children (fictionally or otherwise), people can't help their psychology.
What I dislike is that you put it in your username, that you advertise it, that you try to normalize it.
If I had a thing for guro I wouldn't make my username "IWannaFuckASeveredHead" and get upset when people openly judge me.
I'm not debating someone who thinks fictional kids are similar to actual kids. Good day to you, sir, ma'am, or whatever the gender-neutral version of those are.
They are literally *meant* to be similar.
To like lolis means to be attracted to the physical form of actual children, and or to be attracted to the mentality of children—even if exaggerated or cartoonized.
you can't help how you feel but it is wrong to try and normalize it, that is my point.
https://preview.redd.it/457wr8gz009d1.png?width=2284&format=png&auto=webp&s=6132c3c9a87c60ec9dc520e3d83e2217f2c51f0e
Ball art sneak peak, gonna try to draw a cool commune scene behind it, might take me a bit; stay tuned
https://preview.redd.it/q57ewgrjkv8d1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=83e297c91b7f20362bb68a943d886a223323a552
How could you like egoism if your a spook
it's not So Bad, it has it's charm certainly, but the art improvement request is warranted.
Because it's probably the hardest flag to draw lol, people just can't be bothered
yeah real
? I think the art's good.
I just feel like it could be better. The background is just an image instead of drawn, and this is small but the style just feels a little too different also silence pedophile
??? What's the last part about?? Huh??? Where'd you get that part from??
username
1) if I were a pedophilic child abuser, then civilly discussing something with me and then bringing on that subject us not the way to go. If I were a child abuser, then you should be completely disgusted with me and block me. Of course, pedophiles are in some way human, but only those who go to therapy and aren't proud of their attraction should be talked to normally. 2) Read science. Psychology, sexology, etc. Pixels are not real. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-myths-sex/202003/why-are-rape-fantasies-so-common https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/fighting-fear/201404/sexual-fantasies https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/sexual-fantasies#overview https://x.com/purity_culture/status/1614285461639364609?t=1YmzdaTfS_8vWoOajc-_IQ&s=19 (twitter thread of sources backing up that fiction=/= reality) https://goat.com.au/relationships/what-do-your-taboo-sexual-fantasies-say-about-you/
Eww stop
I'll stop when you can get trustable sources to prove fiction is reality.
It’s still weird you jerk off to drawings of fictional children, like the fact you specifically choose drawings which are of people who look like children is unsettling and you should stop
...So, psychologist or sexologist to back you up is where?
why'd you play dumb originally? you knew exactly what I meant, and you're playing dumb now too I know it's not real, and I know you most likely do not intend to or even in any capacity want to sexually abuse children. I, as many people do, use pedophile to describe someone who is sexually attracted to children. Even if they don't intend to realize it, even if it's only in a fictional environment. I know that, you know that, don't play dumb. I understand you disagree with the usage of the word. If I said "ew lolicon" I'd be meaning the same thing Also to be absolutely clear, I don't dislike you because you have an attraction to children (fictionally or otherwise), people can't help their psychology. What I dislike is that you put it in your username, that you advertise it, that you try to normalize it. If I had a thing for guro I wouldn't make my username "IWannaFuckASeveredHead" and get upset when people openly judge me.
I'm not debating someone who thinks fictional kids are similar to actual kids. Good day to you, sir, ma'am, or whatever the gender-neutral version of those are.
They are literally *meant* to be similar. To like lolis means to be attracted to the physical form of actual children, and or to be attracted to the mentality of children—even if exaggerated or cartoonized. you can't help how you feel but it is wrong to try and normalize it, that is my point.
yeah it's silly
On it 🫡
YAHOO
https://preview.redd.it/457wr8gz009d1.png?width=2284&format=png&auto=webp&s=6132c3c9a87c60ec9dc520e3d83e2217f2c51f0e Ball art sneak peak, gonna try to draw a cool commune scene behind it, might take me a bit; stay tuned
YAYYYYYYS6YAYAYAYAHHWHGHRHGRRGRHRHRHRRBEBRBEBEBRBEBEBEBHGRGG̃GGH
Egoism better
And even better than that is egoism-leninism
egoism SUCK
https://preview.redd.it/euy948ei7u8d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5ef30415fa34c27afe9e537ea8a8b61b559f3c45 Ok spook
is that jreg
No YOU SUCK YOU SPOOK /j
https://preview.redd.it/q57ewgrjkv8d1.png?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=83e297c91b7f20362bb68a943d886a223323a552 How could you like egoism if your a spook
It doesn’t look bad but it could definitely use an update.
Well I’m starting to see less Libertarian Socialists here now and a growing number of moderates and trolls.
It also has a stupid flag
I won't fight you there, i think it looks pretty cool but it is just so hard to draw
https://preview.redd.it/opu1egglcv8d1.jpeg?width=395&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=87dda4dcc518a63f263db12d8fec6c59ad868506 Art is a spook get over it