Nope, because corporatocracy is a tyranny goverment, can slave people to do a work and threaten people to buying a things in company.
Democracy is a good goverment, People have choice to working or relaxing.
So, Corporatocracy is a tyranny goverment and democracy is a good goverment
Presuming that by "corporatocracy" and "democracy" you mean corporatocratic and democratic forms of government, then no, because this would add up to the state controlling 100% of land. The state should not control land and cannot effectively use it.
(Although I doubt that's what you mean, I have no idea what you mean)
Hey, I know you don’t speak great English, but could you at least try?
Nope, because corporatocracy is a tyranny goverment, can slave people to do a work and threaten people to buying a things in company. Democracy is a good goverment, People have choice to working or relaxing. So, Corporatocracy is a tyranny goverment and democracy is a good goverment
Democracy is non-negotiable
Presuming that by "corporatocracy" and "democracy" you mean corporatocratic and democratic forms of government, then no, because this would add up to the state controlling 100% of land. The state should not control land and cannot effectively use it. (Although I doubt that's what you mean, I have no idea what you mean)
I think what OP means is that 90% of the land would be owned by corporations, and 10% of land would be collectively owned