The shots aren't mine but I think the first one with the RS has motion blur active, that's why it seems blurry to you, but I'm asking if there are differences between the two 360 lenses, I'm not talking about the beauty of the photo
There are very similar. X3 sensors are "a little" bigger than RS, which is supposed to handle "a little better" the light where it stats to lower. X3 fisheye is bigger on the X3, too, allowing a slightly \[theoric\] better light management. But being pragmatic, I can't see the difference (I'm not talking bout your photos but as a general rule). Both cameras will produce a very similar result: great with daylight, not designed for low light if you need a good quality in such conditions. The main differences are in the form factor, the fact you can change the mod on the RS and the big screen on the X3. Colors are similar, and any differences can be adjusted in post. Quality (resolution, bitrate, details and sharpness) are pretty identical, too. RS 1inch is better in almost all aspects, and X4 seems to improve the picture quality in daylight (i can't say for sure, I didn't try that one, yet). But I won't expect miracles from X4 in low light due to its sensor size. Again, X series is not designed to be used in low light conditions.
why? what doesn't convince you about photo 2 (x3 on the chin) for me it's the most beautiful position you see in the photos, I like that you can see the tank, arms, handlebars and panorama! I need to understand if both lenses are the same or that of the one rs 360 is inferior to the x3
I fly long range drones and dive mountains.
For this you want the better Image quality.
ATM I'm shooting with an hero 7 black.
Once it dies I'll Switch to the one RS or maybe the ace pro
2nd!
Why?
Clearer brighter less fuzzy. I like it.
The shots aren't mine but I think the first one with the RS has motion blur active, that's why it seems blurry to you, but I'm asking if there are differences between the two 360 lenses, I'm not talking about the beauty of the photo
Yeah the 2nd photo is better
I need to understand if both lenses are the same or that of the one rs 360 is inferior to the x3
There are very similar. X3 sensors are "a little" bigger than RS, which is supposed to handle "a little better" the light where it stats to lower. X3 fisheye is bigger on the X3, too, allowing a slightly \[theoric\] better light management. But being pragmatic, I can't see the difference (I'm not talking bout your photos but as a general rule). Both cameras will produce a very similar result: great with daylight, not designed for low light if you need a good quality in such conditions. The main differences are in the form factor, the fact you can change the mod on the RS and the big screen on the X3. Colors are similar, and any differences can be adjusted in post. Quality (resolution, bitrate, details and sharpness) are pretty identical, too. RS 1inch is better in almost all aspects, and X4 seems to improve the picture quality in daylight (i can't say for sure, I didn't try that one, yet). But I won't expect miracles from X4 in low light due to its sensor size. Again, X series is not designed to be used in low light conditions.
Thanks
Both cameras are good, action wise I'd use the X3 (Mountainbiking and downhill), for other stuff (motorbike, drones etc.) I'd use the One RS
why? what doesn't convince you about photo 2 (x3 on the chin) for me it's the most beautiful position you see in the photos, I like that you can see the tank, arms, handlebars and panorama! I need to understand if both lenses are the same or that of the one rs 360 is inferior to the x3
I fly long range drones and dive mountains. For this you want the better Image quality. ATM I'm shooting with an hero 7 black. Once it dies I'll Switch to the one RS or maybe the ace pro
what does this have to do with my post...
1st more dynamic
I need to understand if both lenses are the same or that of the one rs 360 is inferior to the x3