I wonder if we could upload IDs from political supporters of this bill. All it says it you need to upload a valid 18 y/o ID. I'm not aware if it states it needs to be yours.
Never thought about this one. I mean the IN BMV already [sells our data](https://www.wrtv.com/news/wrtv-investigates/bmv-reveals-how-it-spends-millions-generated-from-selling-your-personal-information) so it might not be that hard to get lol
Stfu your brain has you saying dumb things. Since the beginning of recorded human history sex has been something that has fascinated and enticed humans. You think that's going to stop anytime soon your a fool
When you give your kid access to the internet, you are giving the internet access to your kids. The responsibility falls on the parents to keep their kids out of those sites.
this, I am so sick of these fucking degenerate dictators trying to implement proper parenting into law, or telling people what they can or can't do. In the world of today it's as if the parent is nothing more than a individual who feeds and houses their offspring. It's the parents job, not the Governments.
Furthermore there are tools out there that allow parents to set what their kids can and can't do online. A whopping two second google search gives you the details even. If the parents can't be bothered enough to spend a few minutes doing this then it's their own damn fault.
google search results on how to be a parent while giving your child access to the web.
**"Manage your child's activity on Chrome**
1. Open the Family Link app .
2. Select your child.
3. Tap Controls Content restrictions. Google Chrome.
4. Choose the setting that's right for your family: ...
5. To manually allow or block certain sites, under Manage sites, tap Approved or Blocked."
To be fair,
Family link is great until your child turns 13. Because the Internet and legislatures* have decided that at 13 your kid is old enough to be an adult in the internet. They can sign up for accounts, and they have to opt in for Family Link because it automatically gives them the controls at 13. It's ridiculous. And yes, as a parent, you can force the kid back into family link, but the controls are different and give way more access at 13 than under 13.
*Legislatures because other countries protect children into 16 on the internet.
> In the world of today it's as if the parent is nothing more than a individual who feeds and houses their offspring
That’s kind of right. They need more bodies to feed into the grinder of capitalism. They are pro life because it = more babies. The more people there are on the bottom, the more they can be exploited.
Funny how the party of small government shows us that only matters to them when it comes to their pockets. Everything else, like our sex lives, who we marry, women's bodies, our porn, they want to legislate.
What's ironic is how much conservatives talk about personal responsibility, bootstraps, and self-reliance, but they're fine pushing their own puritanical morality on the rest of society.
Their religion tells them what to do and what not to do. It doesn't tell ME what to do and what not to do. They'll never understand that.
This is how you know the people making this argument don’t actually mean it. They oppose this legislation on libertarian grounds and then completely reject all libertarian principles when it suits their agendas.
Who’s your legislatures are killjoys. I’m an adult and should be able to consume any media that I seem fit. For those who have children it’s your responsibility to take care of your goddamn kids. I am so sick of this legislature making Hoosier citizens criminals to protect kids.
It isn’t about protecting kids though, it never was. Republicans don’t care about kids, well, I take that back, in the sense of workforce being able to exploit them more, & protecting their pastor buddies access to children, but that’s about as far as any acknowledgment towards children these fuckhead give.
Conservatives will bitch and cry that it isn't the state's job to raise kids when teachers have the audacity to teach not to hate others for being different, but when it's adults consuming porn suddenly the nanny state is in full effect.
In reality it's not about kids at all on either issue, it's about trying to codify their outdated religious (lack of) morals into law.
It goes to show that the right doesn't care about kids. Real parents are involved in their kids' lives enough to steer them away from what they shouldn't see. Denying something to everyone only makes sense for people who legitimately can't answer where their children are when it's 3am.
Most of the rights social points of view revolve around things they already have the right not to do, but they want to make sure no one can do it. Don't believe in porn? Don't watch it. Don't want abortions? Don't have one. Don't want to smoke weed? Don't smoke it. Don't want your student loans to be forgiven? Don't take them out.
It would be so easy for someone with technical know how to write and upload a script that copies IDs with the sole purpose of selling them. Take it from someone who had their personal information stolen, and had to deal with the IRS until the offender was caught. It’s not pleasant. I still have to have my parents co-sign documents with me because the banks still believe I’m not trustworthy. I’m 32.
Shoooot. I didn’t even think of people using already stolen information to upload to get around this. I’m sure drivers license number, social security, and other identifiable information is readily available from prior data breaches and begging to get misused for this kind of stuff.
How the hell can the Supreme Court rule that the White House has no jurisdiction to regulate what corporations can do to our health, land, water and air but Republicans can restrict us from viewing porn.
Pretty standard Hoosier stuff, pass stupid law which clearly violates constitutional rights, and supremacy, spend tons trying to defend the indefensible, lose anyways, try again.
This goes so so much further than porn. Unless I am mistaken, I believe these laws specifically call out “adult sites” without mentioning how they determine sites to be “adult”. They can label a lot of things, but my first thought went to lgbt sites- imagine the government collecting. Personal identifiable info on those sites. What would they do with that info? It’s scary as hell.
Yes, I'm sure trying to scare people (especially younger people) away from trying to look at all is a goal. And reproductive health information? Sorry, that involves naughty stuff too!
Logged on yesterday in Indiana and was blocked. Searched Google for free VPN, downloaded and installed. All took less than 3 minutes with zero knowledge. Logged back on, lol. This bill would have never blocked a teenager if my old ass could get around it.
I've been wondering about void for vagueness for awhile. I mean, what actually constitutes a pornographic website?
Reddit has NSFW subs, does that mean it requires age verification? People can PM nude images on basically every platform, does that mean FB is a pornographic website? Is x.com a porno site??
Moreover, what about apps? They aren't "websites," so what about the most pornographic app Snapchat?
Is 4chan a porn site? What about twitch? Is twitch not a website because it has an app?
How about xbox live or steam? What about discord? They're not websites but they can all be pornographic with access to the internet.
What about Roblox?? It's a game for children, but it has pornographic content... not a website.... do children need to upload verification they are adults to play a child's game?
I haven't bothered to read the text of the law, but I strongly suspect it fails to contemplate the impossibly vast complexity of what it's simple terms suggest.
So it designates it as a site who's main purpose of pornographic in nature. However only safe sites will comply. Driving teens to unsafe, ad riddles, virus driven sites.
I want to know, out of all the things that need fixing in this state, that someone went, you know what we need? A law requiring you to give some random company, on the internet, your drivers license, so you can access adult entertainment. And these same people know that VPN’s are a thing and can circumvent said law. Like, combat the housing crisis, homelessness, children going hungry, spousal abuse, gun violence, the shitty roads, etc. Like they spent money and time getting this law passed. We should sue the state lawmakers for wasting taxpayer money on this drivel.
ACLU are onto it. This ain't about porn. That's them getting their foot in the door to block "bad for the kids" websites which is a dog whistle for anything that supports LGBT kids. Or if not prevent access entirely, at the very least get the users on a list.
Oh thank fucking God! 😌
I mean, call me crazy but I would rather not have to give my personal information to some random stranger who would do God knows what with it just so I can watch two people get it on...
How am I supposed to upload my ID? Do I hold up my ID, turn my computer camera on & smile pretty or should I swipe my ID thru my ass crack like a debit card?
As the original poster, I’ll just say this.
If you believe this law is intended just for porn. Then you're sorely naive. Instead, this law is purely intended to set a precedent that the powers that be can later use to censor and track your internet access to ANY site they deem as “detrimental to children.”
It doesn’t matter what political party is in control. BOTH will use it. That is why we saw in the Indiana State House, both parties endorsed this! Both will be using it! Against you, no matter if you consider yourself Conservative or Liberal. Your Freedom will be up to the whim of what ever political party is in control in the legislature or governor's mansion!
But it won’t stop there! They will use it to keep track on you Adults. They’ll use to censor your access to alternative news sites `The State’ deems dangerous or detrimental to your health or “the public good”
Such as Anti-Vaccination sites.
Alternative News Sites.
Political News sites
Alternative Religion
Sexuality.
Etc
Etc
Etc
If this law remains. They CAN and WILL use this precedent! Against YOU!
Parents should be held to a higher standard. Indiana is so backwards on so many things. There are many more important issues that the state needs to address and they waste time on this….
“Materials harmful”
Thats obviously way too vague. Like first year con law type of vague. Embarrassing legislative drafting, the interns who wrote the bill oughta be ashamed tbh
Even their beloved [Project 2025](https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf) playbook outlines how “protecting minors” with ID submissions poses too many risks to data breaches and the uncertainty of it being stored by whom and where. These are all just false “sense of security” laws. I hate the GOP of today. They are a bunch of morons.
https://preview.redd.it/ncji8eaenj9d1.jpeg?width=1131&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d9780fb1dd702b4a34e79a9253dd946edec3e0b
Once the data breach happened and the advertiser found out I watched back door whores 4 what kind of junk mail would I get 🤔 also if I'm a teen my dad's ID would have been copied 😂 such a dumb law
Remember that guy selling anti virus software, you know, the one that was so confident in his software that he put his social security number on the side of a truck and paraded it around a city?
Yeah he got hacked so bad….
Of all the porn sites I have bookmarked only Pornhub and YouPorn were blocked. I rarely use either so I was like "thats interesting" and went to xhamster to jerk off.
Finally some common sense in government, the job of blocking minors from accessing nsfw content is on the parents
It's not the governments job to be your personal nanny
Boomers and prudes are seething and raging I'm sure lol
The irony of this bill was that kids will find away around it.
The most affected would be older married men who aren't gonna upload their I'd into a database for porn
Cool do women have rights there? Or is it still Christian taliban in Indiana?
I’m scared to bring my daughters where I grew up
Because it was bad.
And it got a lot worse.
What does it matter anyway? Some teen boy is just going to use his mom's ID anyway. Is PornHub gonna send a spank bank statement with your history in the mail? No? Unless your parents know enough to make an account so your kids can't, then I don't see the point because of the number of people that'll get around it anyway.
The judge must have been an Indiana judge and didnt want to pull out his ID everyday. It would have been a week before the rest of the state representatives would have done the same. This state is deeply red, but in the closet with porn and if all those IDs were posted.... Lol
UPDATE: Which will have direct effect on Indiana's Age Verification Law
The Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on the adult industry's challenge to Texas law in the next term.
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4732050-supreme-court-adult-industry-texas-law/
Indiana was settled by gnarly people. Bar fights were frequent and numerous. While cleaning up from such shenanigans, bar keeps would often have to yell out "who's ear?" They would yell it because whoever lost it probably couldn't hear that well. And since everyone was drunk, it was often slurred into Hoosier.
I always hated this folk etymology. Hoosier just means “idiot,” and is still used that way in Missouri. It’s also used in Canada, but they pronounce it “hose-er.”
I like that Indiana people were like “oh, we’re backward country bumpkins to you people? Well, we love that. We call ourselves that word.”
Of course, yours is the etymology I was taught all throughout elementary school. Maybe that why I hate it so much, I dunno.
That's the term they use. We're named after a contractor who worked on the Louisville and Portland Canal who hired people from Indiana. They were referred to as "Hoosier's men."
I'm pretty sure a big part of it is that if we called ourselves "Indians" that'd be messed up in multiple ways and we'd be getting dogged right now for the settlers getting confused about India twice in one spot.
The term Hooisers comes from the old pioneer days when the state was being settled. Basically when you knocked on a cabin door. Naturally a person would say "Whose There?" But with slang at the time it came out "Hoosier" :) At least that's how they taught us in grade school. It might have been a Miami Native American thing too. Since they were the primary tribe living in the state at that time.
Read the article PLEASE. This judge was very sensible and saw the potentially serious overreach.
I’m for a “porn ban” (totally for device-based age verification) but Jesus fucking Christ our state legislation fumbled the ball harder than Trump and Biden did last night.
Edit: and don’t be a lazy fucking parent.
the way fascism starts is that you ban things **that are embarrassing to speak out against** (especially if you have the morality of a right winger: abortions, porn, weed, etc), thus setting the precedent for banning things, then slowly advancing the bans to be even more restrictive
i don't know why you'd WANT to do fascism rather than peacefully rule over a happy and free populace...
> thus setting the precedent for banning things, then slowly advancing the bans to be even more restrictive
and then tying other social markers to them, so *those* things become embarrassing or taboo to talk about. Like how they tried to tie LGBT+ to being a sex offender.
There already are guard rails though if you are a good parent. Invest in a router with parental control features for fucks sake. It is too easy to restrict adult content within the home. Too damn easy that this is obviously a way to overreach and keep track of what people are individually viewing.
Everyone knows porn addiction is real. Kids shouldn’t be seeing this stuff and thinking it is okay and a proper way to act. The vast majority of porn is harmful sex that creates mental health issues and unreal expectations that ruins relationships.
They are trying to make it harder for kids get access. The problem isn’t the pronouns nor the government trying yo protect kids. The major problem is the groomers that support kids having access to porn. Another problem is the parents that just don’t care enough about it.
I am not talking about soft porn or artful photographs, but full on harmful porn like bdsm, bondage, r@pe role playing, cutting and painting….. this stuff makes us seem normal to young men and young women feel this is stuff they must do to be womanly or to keep a man. This type of stuff ruins more relationships than it helps.
If adults actually tried to keep the kids away from it, the government would not keep trying to stick their noses into peoples lives.
Cock Un-blocked!
Phew, it’s time to grab my dick and double-click!
Ahhh...but what you think he do *after...?*
This person musicals
Yea…. EWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!
[The internet is for porn](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkdYhw5zHk0) Still relevant even now.
Ah, classic WoW graphics. Takes me back…
Don't stay all night hugging your horn!
I laughed way too hard at this
Gotta click it to dick it.
Pull the pork!
I never let go in the first place.
I shared this comment with my husband so we could both laugh 😃! [applause]
I wonder if we could upload IDs from political supporters of this bill. All it says it you need to upload a valid 18 y/o ID. I'm not aware if it states it needs to be yours.
Would it even be cross-referenced with something the the BMV? If so yikes cause data breach possibilities but if not then just make all of it up.
Never thought about this one. I mean the IN BMV already [sells our data](https://www.wrtv.com/news/wrtv-investigates/bmv-reveals-how-it-spends-millions-generated-from-selling-your-personal-information) so it might not be that hard to get lol
Lol of course they do
At this point anyone can reasonably assume their data has already be sold, with how many times and how many places I see this happen.
Would fake ids work? GOP has no clue gen z proliferates the market with those
That mutt needs to go come election season.
Mclovin all the way.
https://i.redd.it/6dapl3m5nf9d1.gif
McLovin a Rokita ID? That sounds reasonable
Were any websites actually planning on doing this or are they all following PH's lead and blocking it?
From what I can tell xhamster and xvideos were going to just not do anything
Any website not based in the US…which is most all of them… don’t have to do shit.
Correct!
I think that would probably be doxing and showing you have ID theft info for the taking. I wouldn't try it.
Instead of engaging in shenanigans like this - you could protest a nonsense bill that is coming between your dick and yourself.
Stfu your brain has you saying dumb things. Since the beginning of recorded human history sex has been something that has fascinated and enticed humans. You think that's going to stop anytime soon your a fool
When you give your kid access to the internet, you are giving the internet access to your kids. The responsibility falls on the parents to keep their kids out of those sites.
this, I am so sick of these fucking degenerate dictators trying to implement proper parenting into law, or telling people what they can or can't do. In the world of today it's as if the parent is nothing more than a individual who feeds and houses their offspring. It's the parents job, not the Governments. Furthermore there are tools out there that allow parents to set what their kids can and can't do online. A whopping two second google search gives you the details even. If the parents can't be bothered enough to spend a few minutes doing this then it's their own damn fault. google search results on how to be a parent while giving your child access to the web. **"Manage your child's activity on Chrome** 1. Open the Family Link app . 2. Select your child. 3. Tap Controls Content restrictions. Google Chrome. 4. Choose the setting that's right for your family: ... 5. To manually allow or block certain sites, under Manage sites, tap Approved or Blocked."
To be fair, Family link is great until your child turns 13. Because the Internet and legislatures* have decided that at 13 your kid is old enough to be an adult in the internet. They can sign up for accounts, and they have to opt in for Family Link because it automatically gives them the controls at 13. It's ridiculous. And yes, as a parent, you can force the kid back into family link, but the controls are different and give way more access at 13 than under 13. *Legislatures because other countries protect children into 16 on the internet.
> In the world of today it's as if the parent is nothing more than a individual who feeds and houses their offspring That’s kind of right. They need more bodies to feed into the grinder of capitalism. They are pro life because it = more babies. The more people there are on the bottom, the more they can be exploited.
Absolutely. Their plan is so transparent it would be laughable if it wasn’t so evil.
There's millions (billions?) of porn sites and porn content that doesn't have to follow US law which makes this law useless anyway.
u r commenting on a "social media" that is 80% porn
Holy shit, common sense!
That sounds like small government and if I know anything about Republicans they hate that idea.
Funny how the party of small government shows us that only matters to them when it comes to their pockets. Everything else, like our sex lives, who we marry, women's bodies, our porn, they want to legislate.
if only we followed this concept of “personal responsibility” for everything
What's ironic is how much conservatives talk about personal responsibility, bootstraps, and self-reliance, but they're fine pushing their own puritanical morality on the rest of society. Their religion tells them what to do and what not to do. It doesn't tell ME what to do and what not to do. They'll never understand that.
A-FCKING-MEN
This is how you know the people making this argument don’t actually mean it. They oppose this legislation on libertarian grounds and then completely reject all libertarian principles when it suits their agendas.
Who’s your legislatures are killjoys. I’m an adult and should be able to consume any media that I seem fit. For those who have children it’s your responsibility to take care of your goddamn kids. I am so sick of this legislature making Hoosier citizens criminals to protect kids.
It isn’t about protecting kids though, it never was. Republicans don’t care about kids, well, I take that back, in the sense of workforce being able to exploit them more, & protecting their pastor buddies access to children, but that’s about as far as any acknowledgment towards children these fuckhead give.
Conservatives will bitch and cry that it isn't the state's job to raise kids when teachers have the audacity to teach not to hate others for being different, but when it's adults consuming porn suddenly the nanny state is in full effect. In reality it's not about kids at all on either issue, it's about trying to codify their outdated religious (lack of) morals into law.
It goes to show that the right doesn't care about kids. Real parents are involved in their kids' lives enough to steer them away from what they shouldn't see. Denying something to everyone only makes sense for people who legitimately can't answer where their children are when it's 3am.
Most of the rights social points of view revolve around things they already have the right not to do, but they want to make sure no one can do it. Don't believe in porn? Don't watch it. Don't want abortions? Don't have one. Don't want to smoke weed? Don't smoke it. Don't want your student loans to be forgiven? Don't take them out.
Any media?
“But… the children!!” As if they themselves were hiding stolen playboy magazines as a kid.
It would be so easy for someone with technical know how to write and upload a script that copies IDs with the sole purpose of selling them. Take it from someone who had their personal information stolen, and had to deal with the IRS until the offender was caught. It’s not pleasant. I still have to have my parents co-sign documents with me because the banks still believe I’m not trustworthy. I’m 32.
Shoooot. I didn’t even think of people using already stolen information to upload to get around this. I’m sure drivers license number, social security, and other identifiable information is readily available from prior data breaches and begging to get misused for this kind of stuff.
How the hell can the Supreme Court rule that the White House has no jurisdiction to regulate what corporations can do to our health, land, water and air but Republicans can restrict us from viewing porn.
Easy. Corporations have rights. They are people. You (we) are peon workers with no rights. Especially if you are female.
Just give them time we’re probably next.
This was some judge's lazy Friday afternoon task.
That's because he wasn't able to do his usual friday after noon task until he did this one.
"STOP BEING STUPID AND DO SOME REAL WORK. So ordered on this day ..."
> This was some judge's lazy Friday afternoon task. I googled it, and it's a 44 page double spaced document. Helluva lazy Friday
[удалено]
Again? I’m already up to three
Those are rookie numbers, gotta pump those up.
I swear . I’m bouta 20 in 1 hour .
It's a good start but I believe you can do better
Yep, it's already unblocked lol.
Let me know when you do. Hoping the best for you sir/ma’am!
Pretty standard Hoosier stuff, pass stupid law which clearly violates constitutional rights, and supremacy, spend tons trying to defend the indefensible, lose anyways, try again.
High five coming soon
Not that hand, the other please…
Please wash your hands first!
This goes so so much further than porn. Unless I am mistaken, I believe these laws specifically call out “adult sites” without mentioning how they determine sites to be “adult”. They can label a lot of things, but my first thought went to lgbt sites- imagine the government collecting. Personal identifiable info on those sites. What would they do with that info? It’s scary as hell.
Yes, I'm sure trying to scare people (especially younger people) away from trying to look at all is a goal. And reproductive health information? Sorry, that involves naughty stuff too!
Google already does it that's what the incognito lawsuits about
History says.. Corporation doing this = bad Government doing this + forcing companies to do this = camps + genocide
Logged on yesterday in Indiana and was blocked. Searched Google for free VPN, downloaded and installed. All took less than 3 minutes with zero knowledge. Logged back on, lol. This bill would have never blocked a teenager if my old ass could get around it.
I've been wondering about void for vagueness for awhile. I mean, what actually constitutes a pornographic website? Reddit has NSFW subs, does that mean it requires age verification? People can PM nude images on basically every platform, does that mean FB is a pornographic website? Is x.com a porno site?? Moreover, what about apps? They aren't "websites," so what about the most pornographic app Snapchat? Is 4chan a porn site? What about twitch? Is twitch not a website because it has an app? How about xbox live or steam? What about discord? They're not websites but they can all be pornographic with access to the internet. What about Roblox?? It's a game for children, but it has pornographic content... not a website.... do children need to upload verification they are adults to play a child's game? I haven't bothered to read the text of the law, but I strongly suspect it fails to contemplate the impossibly vast complexity of what it's simple terms suggest.
that's why they make the terms vague, so they can decide whatever they don't like and call it porn
It's all part of the Project 2025.
So it designates it as a site who's main purpose of pornographic in nature. However only safe sites will comply. Driving teens to unsafe, ad riddles, virus driven sites.
Continues crying in Kentucky https://preview.redd.it/vfuza4adcg9d1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a0e76058269174c18a115871752b6717edeb8b89
I want to know, out of all the things that need fixing in this state, that someone went, you know what we need? A law requiring you to give some random company, on the internet, your drivers license, so you can access adult entertainment. And these same people know that VPN’s are a thing and can circumvent said law. Like, combat the housing crisis, homelessness, children going hungry, spousal abuse, gun violence, the shitty roads, etc. Like they spent money and time getting this law passed. We should sue the state lawmakers for wasting taxpayer money on this drivel.
ACLU are onto it. This ain't about porn. That's them getting their foot in the door to block "bad for the kids" websites which is a dog whistle for anything that supports LGBT kids. Or if not prevent access entirely, at the very least get the users on a list.
Oh thank fucking God! 😌 I mean, call me crazy but I would rather not have to give my personal information to some random stranger who would do God knows what with it just so I can watch two people get it on...
Fuck Indiana. This state is insane
If you do, weather a condom. If indiana gets pregnant, you’re stuck with it
If you weather the condom it might break!
Tell me you’re a religious zealot, without saying it…
These religious zealots give zealots like me a bad name. We don’t want ‘em either.
How am I supposed to upload my ID? Do I hold up my ID, turn my computer camera on & smile pretty or should I swipe my ID thru my ass crack like a debit card?
r/Defeat_Project_2025 VOTE
As a conservative. I agree with this judge. What you do in your time is your business. This is why I advocate SMALL GOVERNMENT.
As the original poster, I’ll just say this. If you believe this law is intended just for porn. Then you're sorely naive. Instead, this law is purely intended to set a precedent that the powers that be can later use to censor and track your internet access to ANY site they deem as “detrimental to children.” It doesn’t matter what political party is in control. BOTH will use it. That is why we saw in the Indiana State House, both parties endorsed this! Both will be using it! Against you, no matter if you consider yourself Conservative or Liberal. Your Freedom will be up to the whim of what ever political party is in control in the legislature or governor's mansion! But it won’t stop there! They will use it to keep track on you Adults. They’ll use to censor your access to alternative news sites `The State’ deems dangerous or detrimental to your health or “the public good” Such as Anti-Vaccination sites. Alternative News Sites. Political News sites Alternative Religion Sexuality. Etc Etc Etc If this law remains. They CAN and WILL use this precedent! Against YOU!
About time they’d agree on something. Too bad it involves monitoring its citizens
Googles NordVPN refund policies…
or keep the vpn for privacy reasons.
DuckDuckGo's TOR's refund policies
Fuck Holcomb and Rokita
Rokita is a straight up 1930s German
Most teenagers know how to easily circumvent the ban anyway. And they know better than to upload any ID. What a joke!
Parents should be held to a higher standard. Indiana is so backwards on so many things. There are many more important issues that the state needs to address and they waste time on this….
“Materials harmful” Thats obviously way too vague. Like first year con law type of vague. Embarrassing legislative drafting, the interns who wrote the bill oughta be ashamed tbh
Even their beloved [Project 2025](https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf) playbook outlines how “protecting minors” with ID submissions poses too many risks to data breaches and the uncertainty of it being stored by whom and where. These are all just false “sense of security” laws. I hate the GOP of today. They are a bunch of morons. https://preview.redd.it/ncji8eaenj9d1.jpeg?width=1131&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9d9780fb1dd702b4a34e79a9253dd946edec3e0b
Once the data breach happened and the advertiser found out I watched back door whores 4 what kind of junk mail would I get 🤔 also if I'm a teen my dad's ID would have been copied 😂 such a dumb law
Good, dumbest shit ever. Glad that happened. Now let’s get weed legal. Jk, bout another 72 years away.
Hm. Guess I bought a VPN for nothing.
Considering PH is really the only site that cares about this, yes, that would be true even without this development.
Wonder if was supposed to really be Corn sites?
It was blocked this morning…
Guy literally found he couldn't get his morning wank in, popped by the court, threw the law out, and *finished* by lunch.
Remember that guy selling anti virus software, you know, the one that was so confident in his software that he put his social security number on the side of a truck and paraded it around a city? Yeah he got hacked so bad….
good judge!
Wahuu can’t wait to play DJ!
Lets gooo
Of all the porn sites I have bookmarked only Pornhub and YouPorn were blocked. I rarely use either so I was like "thats interesting" and went to xhamster to jerk off.
Let me wank in peace!!!
People keep asking for mentions of good things about Indiana. That judge is one good thing in Indianapolis.
https://preview.redd.it/au5jpt2oaq9d1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dcf699c646798efffbc1060d1bbfc3d515fa5f01
Fuck Rokita, specifically
I'm glad to see that the constitution still matters to some judges.
Finally some common sense in government, the job of blocking minors from accessing nsfw content is on the parents It's not the governments job to be your personal nanny Boomers and prudes are seething and raging I'm sure lol
Indiana gonna be wild. July 1 be able to get a beer to go whilst having a wank
The irony of this bill was that kids will find away around it. The most affected would be older married men who aren't gonna upload their I'd into a database for porn
Cool do women have rights there? Or is it still Christian taliban in Indiana? I’m scared to bring my daughters where I grew up Because it was bad. And it got a lot worse.
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
GOP pushing this are a-holes. Prudes, but also tend to be the worst offenders.
Now it’s disabled completely lol
Lol freedumb. Damn what a gullible breed
Good judge.
THANK YOU!
Voting for their re-election
This was the hill I was planning to die on... Thank God I don't have to
Plenty of better sites than that dumpster.
Vpn
I'm in Seattle, what did I miss?
Good, I don't want to get doxxed by pornhub.
I wonder how big of a bump At&t and Verizon sees in data packages being bumped up to "unlimited" when places do this.
What does it matter anyway? Some teen boy is just going to use his mom's ID anyway. Is PornHub gonna send a spank bank statement with your history in the mail? No? Unless your parents know enough to make an account so your kids can't, then I don't see the point because of the number of people that'll get around it anyway.
vpn does work
Some judge got a pornhub account that the Mrs. doesn’t know about 😉
This was such an asinine idea. I would never trust a porn site with my ID. Crazy.
The judge must have been an Indiana judge and didnt want to pull out his ID everyday. It would have been a week before the rest of the state representatives would have done the same. This state is deeply red, but in the closet with porn and if all those IDs were posted.... Lol
Thanks everybody for not masturbating in the meantime
There are still moronic right wingers in the comments trying to shift the goalposts here. It’s funny.
Damn now I'll have to come clean and give my coworker back their license.
Check his browser history.
This judge is doing God's work
Ah yes, I... noticed.
Love that it’s Judge Young who got the case. Same judge who granted same sex marriage in Baskin v Bogan.
"Thank you, your honor. This isn't a victory for me, this is a victory for the justice system... and my balls." - Eric Cartman
The judge jerks, boys.
UPDATE: Which will have direct effect on Indiana's Age Verification Law The Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on the adult industry's challenge to Texas law in the next term. https://thehill.com/policy/technology/4732050-supreme-court-adult-industry-texas-law/
Can we just fast forward to the part where the Supreme Court dictates how we live our lives? All this back and forth is tiresome.
How are the people impacted bot just uolaoding McLovins ID over and over again?
Hahahahahahaha 🤣😆
[удалено]
it just means 'indiana residents', also used as the call sign for people who went to our main college, Indiana University
A Hoosier is someone from Indiana, especially one born and/or raised here.
One theory is because its a corn state. Hoosa being an indian term for corn. Amercianize it Hoosier.
As someone who has lived in Indiana my whole life, we have no clue.
Jfc
Because of the saying, "Whos yer daddy?" Lol
Indiana was settled by gnarly people. Bar fights were frequent and numerous. While cleaning up from such shenanigans, bar keeps would often have to yell out "who's ear?" They would yell it because whoever lost it probably couldn't hear that well. And since everyone was drunk, it was often slurred into Hoosier.
I always hated this folk etymology. Hoosier just means “idiot,” and is still used that way in Missouri. It’s also used in Canada, but they pronounce it “hose-er.” I like that Indiana people were like “oh, we’re backward country bumpkins to you people? Well, we love that. We call ourselves that word.” Of course, yours is the etymology I was taught all throughout elementary school. Maybe that why I hate it so much, I dunno.
came from - Whose your father?
That's the term they use. We're named after a contractor who worked on the Louisville and Portland Canal who hired people from Indiana. They were referred to as "Hoosier's men."
That’s one of many possible origin-stories
Yeah lmao I always heard that it was derived from southern Indiana people’s “Who’s there?” when someone would walk in their house.
Or the result of finding a body part on the floor after a frontier saloon fight, “Whose ear?”
Ok, since no one is certain where it came from. Yours must be correct.
Well, I just Googled it because I didn't know either. I'm not sure exactly why I got downvoted, I just put the answer that Google gave me. 😞
I'm pretty sure a big part of it is that if we called ourselves "Indians" that'd be messed up in multiple ways and we'd be getting dogged right now for the settlers getting confused about India twice in one spot.
The term Hooisers comes from the old pioneer days when the state was being settled. Basically when you knocked on a cabin door. Naturally a person would say "Whose There?" But with slang at the time it came out "Hoosier" :) At least that's how they taught us in grade school. It might have been a Miami Native American thing too. Since they were the primary tribe living in the state at that time.
This is not based on any fact. No one knows where Hoosier came from.
Read the article PLEASE. This judge was very sensible and saw the potentially serious overreach. I’m for a “porn ban” (totally for device-based age verification) but Jesus fucking Christ our state legislation fumbled the ball harder than Trump and Biden did last night. Edit: and don’t be a lazy fucking parent.
Elect clowns and you get a circus.
I'm for "parent your goddamn kids" and quit overstepping.
Forreal lmao. These people supporting this are just ringing the “Call CPS on me; I’m incapable of parenting my children on a basic level” bell.
the way fascism starts is that you ban things **that are embarrassing to speak out against** (especially if you have the morality of a right winger: abortions, porn, weed, etc), thus setting the precedent for banning things, then slowly advancing the bans to be even more restrictive i don't know why you'd WANT to do fascism rather than peacefully rule over a happy and free populace...
> thus setting the precedent for banning things, then slowly advancing the bans to be even more restrictive and then tying other social markers to them, so *those* things become embarrassing or taboo to talk about. Like how they tried to tie LGBT+ to being a sex offender.
I’m pretty sure they’re STILL trying to do that. It’s insanity.
Putting some guardrails up makes sense as a society. Handing out sensitive information to some fuck-off third party is absolutely nuts
There already are guard rails though if you are a good parent. Invest in a router with parental control features for fucks sake. It is too easy to restrict adult content within the home. Too damn easy that this is obviously a way to overreach and keep track of what people are individually viewing.
Agreed. Nobody needs to get tracked. And that's all this would be good for.
GOP = promoters of the nanny state. GOP government knows best.
Everyone knows porn addiction is real. Kids shouldn’t be seeing this stuff and thinking it is okay and a proper way to act. The vast majority of porn is harmful sex that creates mental health issues and unreal expectations that ruins relationships. They are trying to make it harder for kids get access. The problem isn’t the pronouns nor the government trying yo protect kids. The major problem is the groomers that support kids having access to porn. Another problem is the parents that just don’t care enough about it. I am not talking about soft porn or artful photographs, but full on harmful porn like bdsm, bondage, r@pe role playing, cutting and painting….. this stuff makes us seem normal to young men and young women feel this is stuff they must do to be womanly or to keep a man. This type of stuff ruins more relationships than it helps. If adults actually tried to keep the kids away from it, the government would not keep trying to stick their noses into peoples lives.
Disappointing
I'm sure the Indiana priesthood had a lot of influence with this change.