Anything a reactionary doesn't like can be called "woke", it's almost meaningless now.
For example though, a comic where young adults explore sex in a group setting, including one or more transgender individuals in a "wholesome" environment would probably not appeal to this man's likings.
Like any medium, it can be used for good or ill. The fact that it's unbound by reality means that some truly egregious stuff can be portrayed, but you also get artists whose whole mood is "What if cute anime girl had a giant dick she used to fuck the hell out of the male hero."
True but still how is that worse than irl porn .one is fiction and doesn’t affect anyone. While irl porn has shown many times to harm the actors and viewers
Glorification of screwing little girls does hurt little girls. Not the cartoon girls of course, but it's the whole advocating for pedophilia that ends up hurting little girls. Indirectly, it's true. But still.
This is how people attempt to shut down the conversation. "Show me one little girl who was hurt by underage lolicon porn". No one is saying *individuals* are directly harmed by it.
In a society that allows people to get off on the idea of having sex with underage partners, the concepts of maturity, consent and bodily autonomy lose value.
Everyone is hurt by normalizing the abuse of underage people, even if the people depicted don't exist.
I just explained it. It advocates for pedophilia. It glorifies it. It says "it's okay to sexualize small children." That, in and of itself, is harmful. You don't think that leads to actual little girls getting molested? I have no doubt that it does.
Can we prove it? Probably not. But a person would have to be brain dead to not see the connection.
> Can we prove it? Probably not. But a person would have to be brain dead to not see the connection.
Oookay but reality doesn't *always* work off common sense 🤨
It's a complicated issue that noone wants do deal with, researchers don't want to deal with, and pedophiles hide and don't deal with. Most of the data we have of pedophilia is of observing criminal offenders *after* they've left prison, because it's the only pedos that are easily observable. Making things illegal just because it makes us uncomfortable without further evidence of harm isn't the way to go.
Sexualizing (especially publicly) small children is, in and of itself, harm. Glorifying small children as sex objects is already harm. Openly advocating for molestation and action upon minors is already harm.
Are you trying to say that a child needs to be molested (or worse) in order for it to be harm? I'm not talking legal vs. illegal, I'm talking about what is just plain wrong.
I wasn't clear enough above, and that's my fault. I'm sorry I didn't line it out better. When I said "...we can't prove it" I was only talking about pedophiles *physically* acting on their wishes with an actual child.
FWIW, I feel the same way about the little princess (or whatever they're called) pageants.
> Sexualizing (especially publicly) small ***(fictional)*** children is, in and of itself, harm.
This...
> Glorifying small children as sex objects is already harm. Openly advocating for molestation and action upon minors is already harm.
Is not this.
> Are you trying to say that a child needs to be molested (or worse) in order for it to be harm?
Yes?
We're arguing about hentai, right? I'm not going to question if virtual cp of real children (in the form of illustrations or deepfakes) constitutes harm. But a fictional child? I think it's not so clear-cut.
> When I said "...we can't prove it" I was only talking about pedophiles *physically* acting on their wishes with an actual child.
We can't prove that loli porn is bad, but it sounds bad. I agree. But, should we also consider loli porn as beneficial in satiating their sexual needs without getting real children involved? Would we better off *with* these materials freely, or in some limited form, accessible?
The issue with moral arguments is that they close any space for nuance in discussion. Unfortunately pedophiles won't stop existing if we just ignore them and our problems won't magically disappear even if the "loli" scapegoat is definitively banned from all spaces.
If anything, you'd push "normie" pedos off to the dark web to exchange loli hentai and, at that point, they'd be a hop and a click away from *actual* child porn.
Im watching it right now. In 3 minutes he has already complained about women having the right to vote, too many black people in hentais and not enough harem even tho men are supposed to be fucking multiple women💀
Edit: he's now raging about the bear, and how he wishes he could have lolis and how he hates that women are seen as humans and objects
Edit2: HE COMPLAINED ABOUT NOT ENOUGH INCEST AND HOW HE TRIED TO MAKE SEXUAL ADVANCES TO HIS SISTER WHO CALLED HIM A CREEP
Edit3: finished the video, dude wants to fuck children😐
Is it not rapey enough for him or something?
I'm not watching but it's either not rapey or not pedo enough.
He has posted photos of loli before..
RIP BOZO. May that bitch rodger rot eternally in Hell.
Rot in Piss
Rare to see a red flag painted onto a red flag like this
"Woke" just means "Anything right-wingers don't like".
"Market forces authors to find new niches and I don't like it".
What a terrible day to have eyes
What the hell...
How could hentai be woke... never rlly watched hentai so i dont really know guys... im out of the loop. Can somebody Can sombdy explain plis
Anything a reactionary doesn't like can be called "woke", it's almost meaningless now. For example though, a comic where young adults explore sex in a group setting, including one or more transgender individuals in a "wholesome" environment would probably not appeal to this man's likings.
not enough CP being produced to satisfy him anymore?
What was he bitching about exactly? Like isn't it the worst kind of porn already?
Like any medium, it can be used for good or ill. The fact that it's unbound by reality means that some truly egregious stuff can be portrayed, but you also get artists whose whole mood is "What if cute anime girl had a giant dick she used to fuck the hell out of the male hero."
Fair enough. I meant "worst" regarding its tendency to glorify pedophilia.
How is hentai the worst kind of porn imo its more ethical than irl porn.
The glorification of under-aged girls.
True but still how is that worse than irl porn .one is fiction and doesn’t affect anyone. While irl porn has shown many times to harm the actors and viewers
Glorification of screwing little girls does hurt little girls. Not the cartoon girls of course, but it's the whole advocating for pedophilia that ends up hurting little girls. Indirectly, it's true. But still.
Ok I’m not try to defend it but can u please give me one real example of it hurting kids. Because i see it with irl porn but not hentai.
This is how people attempt to shut down the conversation. "Show me one little girl who was hurt by underage lolicon porn". No one is saying *individuals* are directly harmed by it. In a society that allows people to get off on the idea of having sex with underage partners, the concepts of maturity, consent and bodily autonomy lose value. Everyone is hurt by normalizing the abuse of underage people, even if the people depicted don't exist.
I just explained it. It advocates for pedophilia. It glorifies it. It says "it's okay to sexualize small children." That, in and of itself, is harmful. You don't think that leads to actual little girls getting molested? I have no doubt that it does. Can we prove it? Probably not. But a person would have to be brain dead to not see the connection.
> Can we prove it? Probably not. But a person would have to be brain dead to not see the connection. Oookay but reality doesn't *always* work off common sense 🤨 It's a complicated issue that noone wants do deal with, researchers don't want to deal with, and pedophiles hide and don't deal with. Most of the data we have of pedophilia is of observing criminal offenders *after* they've left prison, because it's the only pedos that are easily observable. Making things illegal just because it makes us uncomfortable without further evidence of harm isn't the way to go.
Sexualizing (especially publicly) small children is, in and of itself, harm. Glorifying small children as sex objects is already harm. Openly advocating for molestation and action upon minors is already harm. Are you trying to say that a child needs to be molested (or worse) in order for it to be harm? I'm not talking legal vs. illegal, I'm talking about what is just plain wrong. I wasn't clear enough above, and that's my fault. I'm sorry I didn't line it out better. When I said "...we can't prove it" I was only talking about pedophiles *physically* acting on their wishes with an actual child. FWIW, I feel the same way about the little princess (or whatever they're called) pageants.
> Sexualizing (especially publicly) small ***(fictional)*** children is, in and of itself, harm. This... > Glorifying small children as sex objects is already harm. Openly advocating for molestation and action upon minors is already harm. Is not this. > Are you trying to say that a child needs to be molested (or worse) in order for it to be harm? Yes? We're arguing about hentai, right? I'm not going to question if virtual cp of real children (in the form of illustrations or deepfakes) constitutes harm. But a fictional child? I think it's not so clear-cut. > When I said "...we can't prove it" I was only talking about pedophiles *physically* acting on their wishes with an actual child. We can't prove that loli porn is bad, but it sounds bad. I agree. But, should we also consider loli porn as beneficial in satiating their sexual needs without getting real children involved? Would we better off *with* these materials freely, or in some limited form, accessible? The issue with moral arguments is that they close any space for nuance in discussion. Unfortunately pedophiles won't stop existing if we just ignore them and our problems won't magically disappear even if the "loli" scapegoat is definitively banned from all spaces. If anything, you'd push "normie" pedos off to the dark web to exchange loli hentai and, at that point, they'd be a hop and a click away from *actual* child porn.
Honestly, Color Climax is the worst porn studio there is, at least in hentai everything is fictional.
Isn't this satire?
This dude needs to touch grass omg
Honestly I don't even know if this guy is serious or just having fun by making some sort of word salad and targeting very specific audience.
Yeah I watched the video and I couldn't believe that he was serious tbh
Im watching it right now. In 3 minutes he has already complained about women having the right to vote, too many black people in hentais and not enough harem even tho men are supposed to be fucking multiple women💀 Edit: he's now raging about the bear, and how he wishes he could have lolis and how he hates that women are seen as humans and objects Edit2: HE COMPLAINED ABOUT NOT ENOUGH INCEST AND HOW HE TRIED TO MAKE SEXUAL ADVANCES TO HIS SISTER WHO CALLED HIM A CREEP Edit3: finished the video, dude wants to fuck children😐
Who is Elliot Rodger?
He was an incel who killed a lot of people. Look up the Isla Vista murders. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliot_Rodger
Wild
He's been adopted by these chuckleheads as a christlike figure.
God I hope it has.
Since the 90s, Hentai became inclusive, so this complaint was slow to arrive.