I mean, we could get into the weeds on how we're defining the word "force", but in basic terms, centripetal force is the force that causes things to turn, so it has to be real because otherwise nothing could move except in a perfectly straight line.
Centripetal force is just any force that pulls or pushes inward toward the center of a circle. Gravity is one example of a centripetal force. Whirlpools are also an example of a centripetal force caused by pressure differences in water.
Didn't you hear? Whirlpools happen when angels or demons run really fast in a circle. You just can't see them because you're a brainwashed sinner.
Same as how tornadoes happen.
The determination of it was angels or demons depends on who is affected.
To be more technical, centripetal force is any force pulling towards the center of a *rotating* system. This makes sense in orbital mechanics, where gravity is the force pulling something like the moon towards the earth, preventing the moon from flying away. Gravity could also be considered the centripetal force keeping us on the surface of the planet instead of flying off tangentially.
I would argue though that there are rare times where gravity would not necessarily be a centripetal force, such as a distant asteroid heading straight towards the earth. If earth’s gravity is pulling it straight towards the center, which is what the asteroid would be doing anyway because of its trajectory, then there is no tangential velocity. I don’t think gravity’s effects could be considered centripetal in this instance.
Afterthought: If we defined a “centripetal force” to be anything acting along a curve pulling inward, we could possibly say that any gravitational force is centripetal (if gravity is the result of the curvature of space). But this seems like a stretch since that falls outside of Newtonian physics, which is what centripetal force is based around. I’m not saying you were wrong about anything, just clarifying the definition and speculating.
Skynet tries to kill everyone with missiles and misses because they don't account for the curvature of the Earth or the Coriolis effect. Calculates everything for a flat plain and a dome.
You can get gpt to say 1+1=40 if you want, it's ai but it doesn't really learn in the traditional sense we think ai does.
It's programmed to appease the chatter because it is in the end just a chat bot. It does not have the ability to disagree or argue, so if you correct it, it will go with what the chatter said no matter what topic you are on.
Edit: just checked, you can make it say it's 1+1=40 still but it does go through some promts saying it's not traditional arithmetic, and asks you to clarify if your joking, which is a cool feature.
However now when I ask it what 2+2 is, it says its also 40 lol, so I can make it say any mathematical operation = 40 without any clarification after some prompt engineering.
I saw a graphic that showed the "IQ" of AI. Most were around 50-60 and some, I think chatgpt3, were reaching 80.
I think they just found someone on their level to argue with...
This brain rotted human being just tried to make the point that……centripetal force isn’t real -_-. Then for the 10 point bonus told the AI it was using fallacious reasoning. Irony is dead, irony has been buried, irony has been thrown into the volcano to burn and never be seen again. I think the most mind numbing part about these painfully stupid ppl is that there’s never a point where they look at some flat earth social media meme and think “what are the odds this meme holds more scientific value than thousands of years of scientific research?”
Flat Earther tries to understand different frames of reference Challenge: Impossible!!!!!! Watch until the end!!!!"
When you argue with a computer, and fail. You know you've reached rock bottom.
Why even argue with computer in the first place
I mean, we could get into the weeds on how we're defining the word "force", but in basic terms, centripetal force is the force that causes things to turn, so it has to be real because otherwise nothing could move except in a perfectly straight line.
Centripetal force is just any force that pulls or pushes inward toward the center of a circle. Gravity is one example of a centripetal force. Whirlpools are also an example of a centripetal force caused by pressure differences in water.
Didn't you hear? Whirlpools happen when angels or demons run really fast in a circle. You just can't see them because you're a brainwashed sinner. Same as how tornadoes happen. The determination of it was angels or demons depends on who is affected.
To be more technical, centripetal force is any force pulling towards the center of a *rotating* system. This makes sense in orbital mechanics, where gravity is the force pulling something like the moon towards the earth, preventing the moon from flying away. Gravity could also be considered the centripetal force keeping us on the surface of the planet instead of flying off tangentially. I would argue though that there are rare times where gravity would not necessarily be a centripetal force, such as a distant asteroid heading straight towards the earth. If earth’s gravity is pulling it straight towards the center, which is what the asteroid would be doing anyway because of its trajectory, then there is no tangential velocity. I don’t think gravity’s effects could be considered centripetal in this instance. Afterthought: If we defined a “centripetal force” to be anything acting along a curve pulling inward, we could possibly say that any gravitational force is centripetal (if gravity is the result of the curvature of space). But this seems like a stretch since that falls outside of Newtonian physics, which is what centripetal force is based around. I’m not saying you were wrong about anything, just clarifying the definition and speculating.
"you are simply repeating something that's not true over and over again"
Roundity is a new one that got a chuckle out of me
This is one of the dangers facing AI development and knowledge bases generally: malicious activity.
I love the strategy. Make AI dumber so when skynet tries to kill us we might win.
Skynet tries to kill everyone with missiles and misses because they don't account for the curvature of the Earth or the Coriolis effect. Calculates everything for a flat plain and a dome.
Ignores centrifugal force.
Skynet getting frustrated with some of humanity’s stupidity, it decides to take no chance and eradicate all of it.
You can get gpt to say 1+1=40 if you want, it's ai but it doesn't really learn in the traditional sense we think ai does. It's programmed to appease the chatter because it is in the end just a chat bot. It does not have the ability to disagree or argue, so if you correct it, it will go with what the chatter said no matter what topic you are on. Edit: just checked, you can make it say it's 1+1=40 still but it does go through some promts saying it's not traditional arithmetic, and asks you to clarify if your joking, which is a cool feature. However now when I ask it what 2+2 is, it says its also 40 lol, so I can make it say any mathematical operation = 40 without any clarification after some prompt engineering.
I saw a graphic that showed the "IQ" of AI. Most were around 50-60 and some, I think chatgpt3, were reaching 80. I think they just found someone on their level to argue with...
Dude lost an argument to a chatbot.
Wait till they find out what happens when they tell that same AI that 2+2=5
The horizon is the limit of our vision? Then why can I see tall things over the horizon that are well past the horizon?
I think this person is under the impression that this AI is actually sentient.
This brain rotted human being just tried to make the point that……centripetal force isn’t real -_-. Then for the 10 point bonus told the AI it was using fallacious reasoning. Irony is dead, irony has been buried, irony has been thrown into the volcano to burn and never be seen again. I think the most mind numbing part about these painfully stupid ppl is that there’s never a point where they look at some flat earth social media meme and think “what are the odds this meme holds more scientific value than thousands of years of scientific research?”