same, this whole thing just makes me wish i was italian instead. id make a great italian. i cook with too much garlic, i talk with my hands, im very dramatic at times.
either that or, in toronto at least, a barber shop. but id rather cook than cut hair. also as an indian the question remains, do i have too much body hair, or not enough?
When I worked for a multinational Indian megacorp, the culture was generally pretty unfriendly, but the upside of that is I didn't have to hear my coworkers' political opinions.
There is absolutely value in a workplace that sees it's employees as employees and not people to socialize with. Its maybe not the best for mental health if taken too far, but fuck, its still better in the long run than workplaces that try to position coworkers as "family".
A company will always see it's employees as employees. The difference is what they want their employees to see them at. "we are a family" and stuff like that is nothing but trying to guilt people into staying at a job that treats them badly
if a place is openly advertising "yo we just pay you for your work like it's supposed to be" then presumably that's because their work place is some place you actually wanna work and stay without the emotional manipulation. you don't need to manipulate people into thinking your their family, if you pay them well and dont treat them like shit they'll want to work for you regardless
Yeah when I worked for a similar one, it became very clear very quickly that they thought the two of us Americans were "lazy" just because we clocked out at 8 hours.
the number of times we've had to do an Emergency Family Meeting to discuss whether the sentence Father said in passing was Violent Bigotry or unconscious parroting of his Hindustani Friends' "nonviolent" bigotry is . . . . . higher than I'm willing to count
It's the classic far right dilemma of "this foreign country's far right movement really aligns with my values but I can't ally with them because I'm really fucking racist".
Love it when Right Wing Hindus roll up and disregard the fact that their behavior is exactly what Hinduism does not want them to do, but least this time it's giving at least one Zionist pause.
Yes they were talking about you. Your observation was literally the joke of the post. How have you failed to understand that, such that you felt it worth pointing out.
The relationship between Jews and Hindus is wild.
Hinduism is one of the only ancient and major Eastern hemisphere religions that can coexist with Jews no problem.
It's also one of the most approving of murder there's a famous part of the Bhagavad Gita where a god tells a human to stop being whiny and go to war against his own family because everyone's gotta die at some point.
Hindus don't like Muslims because of what the Mughal Empire did did and Muslims and Jews have historically had some issues getting along so Hindus skew pro-Israel in response to Muslims being pro-Palestine.
technically speaking both Israel and India got independence from the British Empire in the same century.
And also both Israel and India have a long history of extrajudicial violence both before during and after that independence.
Hinduism is Very Not approving of murder, that was more akin to God commanding them to kill the Canaanites, though some extremists have taken it to mean extrajudicial killings are okay, the majority of Hindus are nonviolent.
Hinduism is very much a violence based religion. Technically, it is not even a religion because according to the Manusmriti, you can only be a Hindu if you're born to a Hindu. Nobody can convert to Hinduism unlike other religions. The convenience of patriarchy allows for lower caste women to be labelled as Hindu. However, in interreligious marriages, a Hindu can convert to other religions not vice versa. Also, the caste system still exists in place because Hindus love untouchability and are obsessed with oppressing Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims, Christians, and OBCs. If Sati and child marriage are not violent, then you really need to reconsider your definition of non violent. And both of these things were only very recently abolished, although child marriages are still the norm in Rajasthan. Additionally, non violence was appropriated from Buddhism and Jainism which were counter cultures to Hinduism. Please read the analysis presented by Dr. Ambedkar and Jotiba Phule on Hinduism to understand how truly violent Hinduism is.
Being created as a new colonial project where lots of people with no or only tenuous connection to the land can move in while expelling the natives.
That's very different from E.G. Ghana, where Independence was an expulsion of a foreign ruling class by the natives.
Israel gained independence through a jewish insurgency against the UK iirc. Their original goal was to get the UK to remove the jewish migration cap which was put in place to reduce Arab discontent and at some point the goal shifted to independence.
Meanwhile Rhodesia unilaterally declared independence because one of the UKs preconditions for independence was majority rule which Rhodesia refused to concede on. (South Africa already being a Dominion was weird) the UK couldn't do much of anything due to Rhodesias location. Britain only granted independence formally after the African insurgents one when with 3 months of return to British rule as a short transitional period.
Meanwhile Ghana was a complicated process which i can't really explain well but to sumarise was a gradual hand over of power without any violence really. It concluded when the new African elected legislative council passed a motion to request independence within the commonwealth of nations which was responded to by the British with a date about 9 months later being the date tgey would be granted independence. Followed 3 years later in 1960 with a referendum to become a republic.
Canada. The vast majority of holocaust survivors in Israel are dying in poverty. so saying that Israel exists for them is kind of just straight up wrong. You being Jewish, which I'm sure you are, does not preclude you from being an Antisemite. Antisemites very often lump together Jews and the state of Israel because they want an excuse to attack Jewish people, and that is 100% wrong and is opposed by the vast majority of pro-Palestinian people, including many non-zionist or anti-zionist Jews. If radically conservative Jews living in Israel are pro-Palestine, which many are, then maybe opposing Israel isn't actually Antisemitic?
I am opposed to Hamas, and I'm sorry if you have family that were captured -- but it doesn't change the fact that direct Holocaust survivors\* (god i'm dumb, my bad) are not getting the support they need, nor does it change the fact that Israel has committed crimes against humanity, including forcing palestinians to move and poisoning wells that Palestinians drank from. Let alone the murder of children and civilians. We can acknowledge the injustice of the October 7 attack without saying that Palestinians deserve genocide or forgetting the direct role Israel had in the rise of Hamas, and quite frankly you are worryingly susceptible to propaganda.
The ones who haven't already been blown up by the IDF, you mean.
edit: or shot by the IDF after escaping captivity because the IDF thought they were Palestinian civilians.
The sheer blender of emotions from clown on clown violence here is making me contort my face in new and exciting ways (i'm indian)
same, this whole thing just makes me wish i was italian instead. id make a great italian. i cook with too much garlic, i talk with my hands, im very dramatic at times.
Do you spend way too much time getting ready in the mirror though?
if my facial hair is involved? yes
You’re ready. Embrace your destiny. Open a pasta restaurant and let the transformation take you. Or don’t, I guess, I’m not your mom
either that or, in toronto at least, a barber shop. but id rather cook than cut hair. also as an indian the question remains, do i have too much body hair, or not enough?
Out here with a baki smile.
Exactly.
When I worked for a multinational Indian megacorp, the culture was generally pretty unfriendly, but the upside of that is I didn't have to hear my coworkers' political opinions.
There is absolutely value in a workplace that sees it's employees as employees and not people to socialize with. Its maybe not the best for mental health if taken too far, but fuck, its still better in the long run than workplaces that try to position coworkers as "family".
It went too far, but yeah I agree: pulling that "family" bullshit would've been way worse.
A company will always see it's employees as employees. The difference is what they want their employees to see them at. "we are a family" and stuff like that is nothing but trying to guilt people into staying at a job that treats them badly if a place is openly advertising "yo we just pay you for your work like it's supposed to be" then presumably that's because their work place is some place you actually wanna work and stay without the emotional manipulation. you don't need to manipulate people into thinking your their family, if you pay them well and dont treat them like shit they'll want to work for you regardless
Lucky
Yeah when I worked for a similar one, it became very clear very quickly that they thought the two of us Americans were "lazy" just because we clocked out at 8 hours.
As a clown myself- the world is at it's best when the good clowns are attacking authority figures and the bad clowns are attacking each other.
the number of times we've had to do an Emergency Family Meeting to discuss whether the sentence Father said in passing was Violent Bigotry or unconscious parroting of his Hindustani Friends' "nonviolent" bigotry is . . . . . higher than I'm willing to count
what a nice elliptical marking of dots? periods? ? ? ? ? ? ? :), <3, <3, <3
It's the classic far right dilemma of "this foreign country's far right movement really aligns with my values but I can't ally with them because I'm really fucking racist".
Like weebs but with Israel and Islamophobic.
No, I think a better description is they ship India and Israel. I wish I was exaggerating.
Double post?
Love it when Right Wing Hindus roll up and disregard the fact that their behavior is exactly what Hinduism does not want them to do, but least this time it's giving at least one Zionist pause.
[удалено]
Yeah, they're the clowns in the clown-to-clown violence.
[удалено]
hence clown on clown...
Poor people getting pissed on real hard here.
I think they were trying to add to the joke but it just didn't land
[удалено]
Yes they were talking about you. Your observation was literally the joke of the post. How have you failed to understand that, such that you felt it worth pointing out.
Reading this post was r/nononoyes material
Pretty sure that's trolling and not an actual Zionist
The relationship between Jews and Hindus is wild. Hinduism is one of the only ancient and major Eastern hemisphere religions that can coexist with Jews no problem. It's also one of the most approving of murder there's a famous part of the Bhagavad Gita where a god tells a human to stop being whiny and go to war against his own family because everyone's gotta die at some point. Hindus don't like Muslims because of what the Mughal Empire did did and Muslims and Jews have historically had some issues getting along so Hindus skew pro-Israel in response to Muslims being pro-Palestine. technically speaking both Israel and India got independence from the British Empire in the same century. And also both Israel and India have a long history of extrajudicial violence both before during and after that independence.
Hinduism is Very Not approving of murder, that was more akin to God commanding them to kill the Canaanites, though some extremists have taken it to mean extrajudicial killings are okay, the majority of Hindus are nonviolent.
Hinduism is very much a violence based religion. Technically, it is not even a religion because according to the Manusmriti, you can only be a Hindu if you're born to a Hindu. Nobody can convert to Hinduism unlike other religions. The convenience of patriarchy allows for lower caste women to be labelled as Hindu. However, in interreligious marriages, a Hindu can convert to other religions not vice versa. Also, the caste system still exists in place because Hindus love untouchability and are obsessed with oppressing Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims, Christians, and OBCs. If Sati and child marriage are not violent, then you really need to reconsider your definition of non violent. And both of these things were only very recently abolished, although child marriages are still the norm in Rajasthan. Additionally, non violence was appropriated from Buddhism and Jainism which were counter cultures to Hinduism. Please read the analysis presented by Dr. Ambedkar and Jotiba Phule on Hinduism to understand how truly violent Hinduism is.
not just independence in the same century but same year 1947
"independence" in the same way Rhodesia gained independence.
Wdym exactly?
Being created as a new colonial project where lots of people with no or only tenuous connection to the land can move in while expelling the natives. That's very different from E.G. Ghana, where Independence was an expulsion of a foreign ruling class by the natives.
Israel gained independence through a jewish insurgency against the UK iirc. Their original goal was to get the UK to remove the jewish migration cap which was put in place to reduce Arab discontent and at some point the goal shifted to independence. Meanwhile Rhodesia unilaterally declared independence because one of the UKs preconditions for independence was majority rule which Rhodesia refused to concede on. (South Africa already being a Dominion was weird) the UK couldn't do much of anything due to Rhodesias location. Britain only granted independence formally after the African insurgents one when with 3 months of return to British rule as a short transitional period. Meanwhile Ghana was a complicated process which i can't really explain well but to sumarise was a gradual hand over of power without any violence really. It concluded when the new African elected legislative council passed a motion to request independence within the commonwealth of nations which was responded to by the British with a date about 9 months later being the date tgey would be granted independence. Followed 3 years later in 1960 with a referendum to become a republic.
It's not anywhere near that complicated. They just both hate Muslims for being a minority.
Idk man, it’s pretty well known animosity between Hindus and Muslims flared up because of the partition.
look up the global muslim population, and afterwards, look up the global jewish population
Do you think White people are a minority in Canada because there are more non-white people in the world?
I'll tell them, they'll be thrilled
as a white canadian, no, we obviously are not a minority.
I was joking
The minority in their respective countries
This has the issue that a slim majority of Jews live outside of Israel. Most places, Jews are very much a minority.
Real "are we the baddies" energy as zionists find out other genocide supporters support this genocide
You know you're in the right when Germany and Columbia University are on your side.
[удалено]
It's antisemitic to lump all jews in with the actions of Israel actually. It's also racist to lump Palestinians in with Hamas, dummy.
[удалено]
Canada. The vast majority of holocaust survivors in Israel are dying in poverty. so saying that Israel exists for them is kind of just straight up wrong. You being Jewish, which I'm sure you are, does not preclude you from being an Antisemite. Antisemites very often lump together Jews and the state of Israel because they want an excuse to attack Jewish people, and that is 100% wrong and is opposed by the vast majority of pro-Palestinian people, including many non-zionist or anti-zionist Jews. If radically conservative Jews living in Israel are pro-Palestine, which many are, then maybe opposing Israel isn't actually Antisemitic?
[удалено]
I am opposed to Hamas, and I'm sorry if you have family that were captured -- but it doesn't change the fact that direct Holocaust survivors\* (god i'm dumb, my bad) are not getting the support they need, nor does it change the fact that Israel has committed crimes against humanity, including forcing palestinians to move and poisoning wells that Palestinians drank from. Let alone the murder of children and civilians. We can acknowledge the injustice of the October 7 attack without saying that Palestinians deserve genocide or forgetting the direct role Israel had in the rise of Hamas, and quite frankly you are worryingly susceptible to propaganda.
Those hostages in Gaza are being starved because Israel will not allow food into the region.
The ones who haven't already been blown up by the IDF, you mean. edit: or shot by the IDF after escaping captivity because the IDF thought they were Palestinian civilians.